Shiao-Wen David Hsu
Positions:
Associate Professor of Medicine
Medicine, Medical Oncology
School of Medicine
William Dalton Family Assistant Professor of Medical Oncology, in the School of Medicine
Medicine, Medical Oncology
School of Medicine
Member of the Duke Cancer Institute
Duke Cancer Institute
School of Medicine
Education:
M.D. 2001
University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Medical Resident, Medicine
University of Texas at Dallas
Fellow in Hematology-Oncology, Medicine
Duke University
Grants:
Identifying gene-environment interactions that confer metabolic vulnerabilities in cancer
Administered By
Pharmacology & Cancer Biology
Awarded By
National Institutes of Health
Role
Collaborator
Start Date
End Date
Targeting KRAS (G12C) Mutant in Colorectal Cancer
Administered By
Medicine, Medical Oncology
Awarded By
Amgen, Inc.
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date
Determining the Efficacy of Liposomal Gemcitabine in Patient Derived Xenografts (PDXs)
Administered By
Medicine, Medical Oncology
Awarded By
FUJIFILM Pharmaceuticals U.S.A.
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date
Targeting the TK1 receptor in colorectal and lung PDX using CarT cell and Motorcar cell
Administered By
Medicine, Medical Oncology
Awarded By
Thunder Biotech
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date
Targeting Calreticulin in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis
Administered By
Medicine, Medical Oncology
Awarded By
National Institutes of Health
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date
Publications:
Phase I study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and everolimus in advanced solid tumors.
PURPOSE: To define maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and pharmacodynamics of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and everolimus in advanced solid tumor patients. DESIGN: This was a standard "3 + 3" dose-escalation trial. All subjects received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg on day 1 of each cycle. Doses for capecitabine, oxaliplatin and everolimus were modified per dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Baseline and on-treatment plasma biomarkers were analyzed. Archived tumor mRNA levels were evaluated for NRP1, NRP2 and VEGF-A isoforms. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for toxicity and 30 for efficacy. Two DLTs were observed in cohort 1 and one DLT each was observed in cohort -1 and -1b. Grade ≥3 toxicities included neutropenia, hypertension, perforation/fistula/hemorrhage, hypertriglyceridemia, diarrhea, and thromboembolism. Twelve subjects experienced partial response (PR); 12 had stable disease as best response. Three of seven chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) subjects experienced PR; 8 of 15 chemonaive mCRC subjects experienced PR. Plasma TβRIII and IL-6 increased on treatment but without correlation to outcome. Increased VEGF165 levels significantly correlated with longer progression free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus with full dose capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab had unacceptable toxicity. MTD was: everolimus 5 mg daily; capecitabine 680 mg/m(2) BID days 1-14; oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) and bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg, day 1. Activity was noted in mCRC.
Authors
Rangwala, F; Bendell, JC; Kozloff, MF; Arrowood, CC; Dellinger, A; Meadows, J; Tourt-Uhlig, S; Murphy, J; Meadows, KL; Starr, A; Broderick, S; Brady, JC; Cushman, SM; Morse, MA; Uronis, HE; Hsu, SD; Zafar, SY; Wallace, J; Starodub, AN; Strickler, JH; Pang, H; Nixon, AB; Hurwitz, HI
MLA Citation
Rangwala, Fatima, et al. “Phase I study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and everolimus in advanced solid tumors.” Invest New Drugs, vol. 32, no. 4, Aug. 2014, pp. 700–09. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/s10637-014-0089-2.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1027394
PMID
24711126
Source
pubmed
Published In
Invest New Drugs
Volume
32
Published Date
Start Page
700
End Page
709
DOI
10.1007/s10637-014-0089-2
A methodology for utilization of predictive genomic signatures in FFPE samples.
BACKGROUND: Gene expression signatures developed to measure the activity of oncogenic signaling pathways have been used to dissect the heterogeneity of tumor samples and to predict sensitivity to various cancer drugs that target components of the relevant pathways, thus potentially identifying therapeutic options for subgroups of patients. To facilitate broad use, including in a clinical setting, the ability to generate data from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues is essential. METHODS: Patterns of pathway activity in matched fresh-frozen and FFPE xenograft tumor samples were generated using the MessageAmp Premier methodology in combination with assays using Affymetrix arrays. Results generated were compared with those obtained from fresh-frozen samples using a standard Affymetrix assay. In addition, gene expression data from patient matched fresh-frozen and FFPE melanomas were also utilized to evaluate the consistency of predictions of oncogenic signaling pathway status. RESULTS: Significant correlation was observed between pathway activity predictions from paired fresh-frozen and FFPE xenograft tumor samples. In addition, significant concordance of pathway activity predictions was also observed between patient matched fresh-frozen and FFPE melanomas. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable and consistent predictions of oncogenic pathway activities can be obtained from FFPE tumor tissue samples. The ability to reliably utilize FFPE patient tumor tissue samples for genomic analyses will lead to a better understanding of the biology of disease progression and, in the clinical setting, will provide tools to guide the choice of therapeutics to those most likely to be effective in treating a patient's disease.
Authors
Freedman, JA; Augustine, CK; Selim, AM; Holshausen, KC; Wei, Z; Tsamis, KA; Hsu, DS; Dressman, HK; Barry, WT; Tyler, DS; Nevins, JR
MLA Citation
Freedman, Jennifer A., et al. “A methodology for utilization of predictive genomic signatures in FFPE samples.” Bmc Med Genomics, vol. 4, July 2011, p. 58. Pubmed, doi:10.1186/1755-8794-4-58.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub758438
PMID
21745407
Source
pubmed
Published In
Bmc Medical Genomics
Volume
4
Published Date
Start Page
58
DOI
10.1186/1755-8794-4-58
Pharmacogenomic strategies provide a rational approach to the treatment of cisplatin-resistant patients with advanced cancer.
PURPOSE: Standard treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) includes the use of a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. However, response rates are highly variable. Newer agents, such as pemetrexed, have shown significant activity as second-line therapy and are currently being evaluated in the front-line setting. We utilized a genomic strategy to develop signatures predictive of chemotherapeutic response to both cisplatin and pemetrexed to provide a rational approach to effective individualized medicine. METHODS: Using in vitro drug sensitivity data, coupled with microarray data, we developed gene expression signatures predicting sensitivity to cisplatin and pemetrexed. Signatures were validated with response data from 32 independent ovarian and lung cancer cell lines as well as 59 samples from patients previously treated with cisplatin. RESULTS: Genomic-derived signatures of cisplatin and pemetrexed sensitivity were shown to accurately predict sensitivity in vitro and, in the case of cisplatin, to predict treatment response in patients treated with cisplatin. The accuracy of the cisplatin predictor, based on available clinical data, was 83.1% (sensitivity, 100%; specificity 57%; positive predictive value, 78%; negative predictive value, 100%). Interestingly, an inverse correlation was seen between in vitro cisplatin and pemetrexed sensitivity, and importantly, between the likelihood of cisplatin and pemetrexed response in patients. CONCLUSION: The use of genomic predictors of response to cisplatin and pemetrexed can be incorporated into strategies to optimize therapy for advanced solid tumors.
Authors
Hsu, DS; Balakumaran, BS; Acharya, CR; Vlahovic, V; Walters, KS; Garman, K; Anders, C; Riedel, RF; Lancaster, J; Harpole, D; Dressman, HK; Nevins, JR; Febbo, PG; Potti, A
MLA Citation
Hsu, David S., et al. “Pharmacogenomic strategies provide a rational approach to the treatment of cisplatin-resistant patients with advanced cancer.” J Clin Oncol, vol. 25, no. 28, Oct. 2007, pp. 4350–57. Pubmed, doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.11.0593.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub734161
PMID
17906199
Source
pubmed
Published In
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume
25
Published Date
Start Page
4350
End Page
4357
DOI
10.1200/JCO.2007.11.0593
The genomic landscape of mantle cell lymphoma is related to the epigenetically determined chromatin state of normal B cells.
In this study, we define the genetic landscape of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) through exome sequencing of 56 cases of MCL. We identified recurrent mutations in ATM, CCND1, MLL2, and TP53. We further identified a number of novel genes recurrently mutated in patients with MCL including RB1, WHSC1, POT1, and SMARCA4. We noted that MCLs have a distinct mutational profile compared with lymphomas from other B-cell stages. The ENCODE project has defined the chromatin structure of many cell types. However, a similar characterization of primary human mature B cells has been lacking. We defined, for the first time, the chromatin structure of primary human naïve, germinal center, and memory B cells through chromatin immunoprecipitation and sequencing for H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3Ac, H3K36me3, H3K27me3, and PolII. We found that somatic mutations that occur more frequently in either MCLs or Burkitt lymphomas were associated with open chromatin in their respective B cells of origin, naïve B cells, and germinal center B cells. Our work thus elucidates the landscape of gene-coding mutations in MCL and the critical interplay between epigenetic alterations associated with B-cell differentiation and the acquisition of somatic mutations in cancer.
Authors
MLA Citation
Zhang, Jenny, et al. “The genomic landscape of mantle cell lymphoma is related to the epigenetically determined chromatin state of normal B cells.” Blood, vol. 123, no. 19, May 2014, pp. 2988–96. Pubmed, doi:10.1182/blood-2013-07-517177.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1025975
PMID
24682267
Source
pubmed
Published In
Blood
Volume
123
Published Date
Start Page
2988
End Page
2996
DOI
10.1182/blood-2013-07-517177
Antihelminth compound niclosamide downregulates Wnt signaling and elicits antitumor responses in tumors with activating APC mutations.
Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation caused by adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutations occurs in approximately 80% of sporadic colorectal cancers (CRC). The antihelminth compound niclosamide downregulates components of the Wnt pathway, specifically Dishevelled-2 (Dvl2) expression, resulting in diminished downstream β-catenin signaling. In this study, we determined whether niclosamide could inhibit the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in human CRCs and whether its inhibition might elicit antitumor effects in the presence of APC mutations. We found that niclosamide inhibited Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation, downregulated Dvl2, decreased downstream β-catenin signaling, and exerted antiproliferative effects in human colon cancer cell lines and CRC cells isolated by surgical resection of metastatic disease, regardless of mutations in APC. In contrast, inhibition of NF-κB or mTOR did not exert similar antiproliferative effects in these CRC model systems. In mice implanted with human CRC xenografts, orally administered niclosamide was well tolerated, achieved plasma and tumor levels associated with biologic activity, and led to tumor control. Our findings support clinical explorations to reposition niclosamide for the treatment of CRC.
Authors
Osada, T; Chen, M; Yang, XY; Spasojevic, I; Vandeusen, JB; Hsu, D; Clary, BM; Clay, TM; Chen, W; Morse, MA; Lyerly, HK
MLA Citation
Osada, Takuya, et al. “Antihelminth compound niclosamide downregulates Wnt signaling and elicits antitumor responses in tumors with activating APC mutations.” Cancer Res, vol. 71, no. 12, June 2011, pp. 4172–82. Pubmed, doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3978.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub764958
PMID
21531761
Source
pubmed
Published In
Cancer Res
Volume
71
Published Date
Start Page
4172
End Page
4182
DOI
10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3978

Associate Professor of Medicine
Contact:
Dept of Medicine, Box 3233, Durham, NC 27710
Duke Box 3233, Durham, NC 27710