Christopher Counter

Overview:

The Counter lab studies the molecular mechanisms underlying the evolution of normal cells into cancer. The lab is divided into two major areas studying key features of human cancers.

Immortalization: We have shown that the ability of cancer cells to keep dividing, or become immortal, is a fundamental aspect of tumorigenesis, and is due to elongation of telomeres. Current efforts focus on the molecular biology of telomere-binding proteins in regulating telomere length.

Proliferation: The ability of tumor cells to proliferate inappropriately is a hallmark of cancer. One gene that plays a key role in this process is the oncogene Ras. We have shown that Ras exerts its oncogenic signals through different proteins at different phases of cancer. Current studies focus on how these different pathways promote cancer and how to inhibit their activity.

Positions:

George Barth Geller Distinguished Professor of Pharmacology

Pharmacology & Cancer Biology
School of Medicine

Professor of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology

Pharmacology & Cancer Biology
School of Medicine

Assistant Professor in Radiation Oncology

Radiation Oncology
School of Medicine

Professor of Cell Biology

Cell Biology
School of Medicine

Member of the Duke Cancer Institute

Duke Cancer Institute
School of Medicine

Education:

B.S. 1990

McMaster University (Canada)

Ph.D. 1996

McMaster University (Canada)

Postdoctoral Fellow, Whitehead Institute For Biomedical Research

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Grants:

Developing inhibitors of RalA function for the treatment of pancreatic cancer

Administered By
Pharmacology & Cancer Biology
Awarded By
National Institutes of Health
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

The role of dietary copper in melanoma

Administered By
Pharmacology & Cancer Biology
Awarded By
National Institutes of Health
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Identifying phosphatidylinositol metabolism vulnerabilities in cancer pathways

Administered By
Pharmacology & Cancer Biology
Awarded By
National Institutes of Health
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Defining RAS isoform- and mutation-specific roles in oncogenesis

Administered By
Pharmacology & Cancer Biology
Awarded By
University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Defining RAS isoform- and mutation-specific roles in oncogenesis

Administered By
Pharmacology & Cancer Biology
Awarded By
University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Publications:

Genetically manipulating endogenous Kras levels and oncogenic mutations in vivo influences tissue patterning of murine tumorigenesis.

Despite multiple possible oncogenic mutations in the proto-oncogene KRAS, unique subsets of these mutations are detected in different cancer types. As KRAS mutations occur early, if not being the initiating event, these mutational biases are ostensibly a product of how normal cells respond to the encoded oncoprotein. Oncogenic mutations can impact not only the level of active oncoprotein, but also engagement with proteins. To attempt to separate these two effects, we generated four novel Cre-inducible (LSL) Kras alleles in mice with the biochemically distinct G12D or Q61R mutations and encoded by native (nat) rare or common (com) codons to produce low or high protein levels. While there were similarities, each allele also induced a distinct transcriptional response shortly after activation in vivo. At one end of the spectrum, activating the KrasLSL-natG12D allele induced transcriptional hallmarks suggestive of an expansion of multipotent cells, while at the other end, activating the KrasLSL-comQ61R allele led to hallmarks of hyperproliferation and oncogenic stress. Evidence suggests that these changes may be a product of signaling differences due to increased protein expression as well as the specific mutation. To determine the impact of these distinct responses on RAS mutational patterning in vivo, all four alleles were globally activated, revealing that hematolymphopoietic lesions were permissive to the level of active oncoprotein, squamous tumors were permissive to the G12D mutant, while carcinomas were permissive to both these features. We suggest that different KRAS mutations impart unique signaling properties that are preferentially capable of inducing tumor initiation in a distinct cell-specific manner.
Authors
Le Roux, Ö; Pershing, NLK; Kaltenbrun, E; Newman, NJ; Everitt, JI; Baldelli, E; Pierobon, M; Petricoin, EF; Counter, CM
MLA Citation
Le Roux, Özgün, et al. “Genetically manipulating endogenous Kras levels and oncogenic mutations in vivo influences tissue patterning of murine tumorigenesis.Elife, vol. 11, Sept. 2022. Pubmed, doi:10.7554/eLife.75715.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1535065
PMID
36069770
Source
pubmed
Published In
Elife
Volume
11
Published Date
DOI
10.7554/eLife.75715

Non-canonical genomic driver mutations of urethane carcinogenesis.

The carcinogen urethane induces pulmonary tumors in mice initiated by an incredibly specific Q61L/R oncogenic mutation in the proto-oncogene Kras. Previous Whole-Exome Sequencing of urethane-induced tumors revealed a bias towards A➙T/G and G➙A substitutions. Subsequent ultra-sensitive Maximum-Depth Sequencing of Kras shortly after urethane exposure suggest a further refinement to CA➙CT/G substitutions. As C182AA➙C182T/GA substitutions in Kras result in Q61L/R mutations, the extreme bias of urethane towards these genomic driver mutations can be ascribed to the specificity of the carcinogen for CA➙CT/G substitutions. However, we previously found that changing rare codons to common in the Kras gene to increase protein expression shifted mutations in urethane-induced tumors away from Kras, or when detected in Kras, to G12D mutations that are usually rarely detected in such tumors. Moreover, the loss of p53 partially reversed this effect, generating tumors with either Q61L/R or G12D oncogenic Kras mutations, or no Kras mutations, presumably due to other genomic driver mutations. Determining the origin of these G12D and other unknown non-canonical genomic driver mutations would provide critical insight into the extreme bias of carcinogens for specific genomic driver mutations. We thus compared the types of Single Nucleotide Variations detected by previously performed Maximum-Depth Sequencing immediately after urethane exposure to the mutation signatures derived from Whole Exome Sequencing of urethane-induced tumors. This identified two types of non-canonical mutations. First, a V637E oncogenic mutation in the proto-oncogene Braf that conforms to the mutation signature of urethane, suggesting that the mutational bias of the carcinogen may account for this non-canonical mutation, similar to that for canonical Q61L/R mutations in Kras. Second, G12D and Q61H mutations in Kras that did not fit this mutation signature, and instead shared similarity with Single Nucleotide Variations detected by Maximum-Depth Sequencing from normal cells, suggesting that perhaps these mutations were pre-existing. We thus posit that when canonical Kras mutations are selected against that the carcinogen may instead promote the expansion of pre-existing genomic driver mutations, although admittedly we cannot rule out other mechanisms. Interrogating the mutation signatures of human lung cancers similarly identified KRAS genomic driver mutations that failed to match the mutation signature of the tumor. Thus, we also speculate that the selection for non-canonical genomic driver mutations during urethane carcinogenesis may reflect the process by which discordance between genomic driver mutations and mutational signatures arises in human cancers.
Authors
MLA Citation
Li, Siqi, and Christopher M. Counter. “Non-canonical genomic driver mutations of urethane carcinogenesis.Plos One, vol. 17, no. 4, 2022, p. e0267147. Pubmed, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267147.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1519414
PMID
35482806
Source
pubmed
Published In
Plos One
Volume
17
Published Date
Start Page
e0267147
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0267147

CHK1 protects oncogenic KRAS-expressing cells from DNA damage and is a target for pancreatic cancer treatment.

We apply genetic screens to delineate modulators of KRAS mutant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) sensitivity to ERK inhibitor treatment, and we identify components of the ATR-CHK1 DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway. Pharmacologic inhibition of CHK1 alone causes apoptotic growth suppression of both PDAC cell lines and organoids, which correlates with loss of MYC expression. CHK1 inhibition also activates ERK and AMPK and increases autophagy, providing a mechanistic basis for increased efficacy of concurrent CHK1 and ERK inhibition and/or autophagy inhibition with chloroquine. To assess how CHK1 inhibition-induced ERK activation promotes PDAC survival, we perform a CRISPR-Cas9 loss-of-function screen targeting direct/indirect ERK substrates and identify RIF1. A key component of non-homologous end joining repair, RIF1 suppression sensitizes PDAC cells to CHK1 inhibition-mediated apoptotic growth suppression. Furthermore, ERK inhibition alone decreases RIF1 expression and phenocopies RIF1 depletion. We conclude that concurrent DDR suppression enhances the efficacy of ERK and/or autophagy inhibitors in KRAS mutant PDAC.
Authors
Klomp, JE; Lee, YS; Goodwin, CM; Papke, B; Klomp, JA; Waters, AM; Stalnecker, CA; DeLiberty, JM; Drizyte-Miller, K; Yang, R; Diehl, JN; Yin, HH; Pierobon, M; Baldelli, E; Ryan, MB; Li, S; Peterson, J; Smith, AR; Neal, JT; McCormick, AK; Kuo, CJ; Counter, CM; Petricoin, EF; Cox, AD; Bryant, KL; Der, CJ
MLA Citation
Klomp, Jennifer E., et al. “CHK1 protects oncogenic KRAS-expressing cells from DNA damage and is a target for pancreatic cancer treatment.Cell Rep, vol. 37, no. 9, Nov. 2021, p. 110060. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110060.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1502486
PMID
34852220
Source
pubmed
Published In
Cell Reports
Volume
37
Published Date
Start Page
110060
DOI
10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110060

Signaling amplitude molds the <i>Ras</i> mutation tropism of urethane

Authors
MLA Citation
Li, Siqi, and Christopher M. Counter. “Signaling amplitude molds the Ras mutation tropism of urethane.” Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 10 Feb. 2021. Crossref, doi:10.1101/2021.02.09.430515.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1515369
Source
crossref
Published Date
DOI
10.1101/2021.02.09.430515

RAS mutation patterns arise from tissue-specific responses to distinct oncogenic signaling

Despite multiple possible oncogenic mutations in the proto-oncogene KRAS , unique subsets of these mutations are detected in different cancer types. As KRAS mutations occur early, if not being initiating, these mutational biases are ostensibly a product of how normal cells respond to the encoded oncoprotein. Oncogenic mutations can impact not only the level of active oncoprotein, but also engagement with effectors and other proteins. To separate these two effects, we generated four novel inducible Kras alleles encoded by the biochemically distinct mutations G12D versus Q61R encoded by native (nat) rare versus common (com) codons to produce either low or high protein levels. Each allele induced a distinct transcriptional response in normal cells. At one end of the spectrum, the Kras natG12D allele induced transcriptional hallmarks suggestive of an expansion of multipotent cells, while at the other end, the Kras comQ61R allele exhibited all the hallmarks of oncogenic stress and inflammation. Further, this dramatic difference in the transcriptomes of normal cells appears to be a product of signaling differences due to increased protein expression as well as the specific mutation. To determine the impact of these distinct responses on RAS mutational patterning in vivo , all four alleles were globally activated, revealing that hematolymphopoietic lesions were sensitive to the level of active oncoprotein, squamous tumors were sensitive to the G12D mutant, while carcinomas were sensitive to both these features. Thus, we identify how specific KRAS mutations uniquely signal to promote the conversion of normal hematopoietic, epithelial, or squamous cells towards a tumorigenic state.
Authors
Erdogan, O; Pershing, NLK; Kaltenbrun, E; Newman, N; Everitt, J; Counter, C
MLA Citation
Erdogan, Ozgun, et al. RAS mutation patterns arise from tissue-specific responses to distinct oncogenic signaling. 2021. Epmc, doi:10.1101/2021.12.10.472098.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1503816
Source
epmc
Published Date
DOI
10.1101/2021.12.10.472098