Susan Dent

Overview:

Medical Oncologist with a focus on breast cancer
Associate Director of Breast Cancer Clinical Research
Co-Director Duke Cardio-Oncology Program

Positions:

Professor of Medicine

Medicine, Medical Oncology
School of Medicine

Member of the Duke Cancer Institute

Duke Cancer Institute
School of Medicine

Education:

M.D. 1990

McMaster University (Canada)

Internal Medicine

Royal College of Physicians (United Kingdom)

Medical Oncology

Royal College of Physicians (United Kingdom)

Grants:

CardiovAscular Risk profile and Treatment patterns in ER+HER2 - Advanced Breast Cancer: A retrospective cohort study (CAREB)

Administered By
Duke Cancer Institute
Awarded By
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

A PHASEIB/III STUDY OF IPATASERTIB PLUS PALBOCICLIB AND FULVESTRANT VERSUS PLACEBO PLUS PALBOCICLIB AND FULVESTRANT IN HORMONE RECEPTOR POSITIVE AND HER2 NEGATIVE LOCALLY ADVANCED UNRESECTABLE OR METASTATIC BREAST CANCER

Administered By
Duke Cancer Institute
Awarded By
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Publications:

Recognition, Prevention, and Management of Arrhythmias and Autonomic Disorders in Cardio-Oncology: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

With the advent of novel cancer therapeutics and improved screening, more patients are surviving a cancer diagnosis or living longer with advanced disease. Many of these treatments have associated cardiovascular toxicities that can manifest in both an acute and a delayed fashion. Arrhythmias are an increasingly identified complication with unique management challenges in the cancer population. The purpose of this scientific statement is to summarize the current state of knowledge regarding arrhythmia identification and treatment in patients with cancer. Atrial tachyarrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation, are most common, but ventricular arrhythmias, including those related to treatment-induced QT prolongation, and bradyarrhythmias can also occur. Despite increased recognition, dedicated prospective studies evaluating true incidence are lacking. Moreover, few studies have addressed appropriate prevention and treatment strategies. As such, this scientific statement serves to mobilize the cardio-oncology, electrophysiology, and oncology communities to develop clinical and scientific collaborations that will improve the care of patients with cancer who have arrhythmias.
Authors
Fradley, MG; Beckie, TM; Brown, SA; Cheng, RK; Dent, SF; Nohria, A; Patton, KK; Singh, JP; Olshansky, B
MLA Citation
Fradley, Michael G., et al. “Recognition, Prevention, and Management of Arrhythmias and Autonomic Disorders in Cardio-Oncology: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation, vol. 144, no. 3, July 2021, pp. e41–55. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000986.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1490006
PMID
34134525
Source
pubmed
Published In
Circulation
Volume
144
Published Date
Start Page
e41
End Page
e55
DOI
10.1161/CIR.0000000000000986

Cardiovascular Toxicity of Novel HER2-Targeted Therapies in the Treatment of Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: HER2-targeted therapies have led to improved clinical outcomes in early and advanced breast cancer (BC). We review the long-term cardiotoxicity of HER2-targeted therapy in early and advanced BC, our current knowledge of cardiotoxicity of novel HER2-targeted therapies, and propose a cardiac monitoring (CM) strategy for this population. RECENT FINDINGS: Long-term data from studies with HER2-targeted therapy in the adjuvant setting have failed to demonstrate an increase in cardiotoxicity over time, and rates of cardiotoxicity seen with novel HER2 agents remain low. Despite over a decade of experience with HER2-targeted therapy, CM in clinical practice is inconsistent in patients with early BC and almost non-existent in advanced BC. Long-term follow-up of clinical trials with HER2-targeted agents in early and advanced BC has failed to demonstrate increased rates of cardiotoxicity over time, attesting to the long-term safety of this class of drugs for the majority of patients, although the long-term cardiac safety of newer HER2 agents in the non-clinical trial setting is largely unknown. We propose CM incorporating clinical history, cardiac imaging, and biomarkers.
Authors
Dent, SF; Morse, A; Burnette, S; Guha, A; Moore, H
MLA Citation
Dent, Susan F., et al. “Cardiovascular Toxicity of Novel HER2-Targeted Therapies in the Treatment of Breast Cancer.Curr Oncol Rep, vol. 23, no. 11, Aug. 2021, p. 128. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/s11912-021-01114-x.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1495121
PMID
34453232
Source
pubmed
Published In
Current Oncology Reports
Volume
23
Published Date
Start Page
128
DOI
10.1007/s11912-021-01114-x

Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with early-stage breast cancer: the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) MA.21 experience.

<h4>Purpose</h4>Anthracyclines are frequently used in adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer (ESBC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate cardiotoxic effects in the first five years after treatment with different anthracycline-based regimens.<h4>Methods</h4>CCTG MA.21 (NCT000142) was a phase III trial in ESBC that compared cyclophosphamide (75 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) orally for 14 days, epirubicin (60 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) and fluorouracil, IV days one and eight (CEF) for six cycles; dose-dense epirubicin (120 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) and cyclophosphamide, IV every 2 weeks for six cycles with concurrent G-CSF then paclitaxel every 2 weeks for four cycles (ddEC/T); doxorubicin (60 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) every 3 weeks for four cycles then four cycles q3 weekly paclitaxel (175 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) (AC/T).<h4>Endpoints</h4>LVEF decline; LV function changes (heart failure), or Grade 3-4 cardiac ischemia/infarction. A competing risk analysis was performed with endpoints of cardiotoxicity or recurrence in first 5 years after completion of chemotherapy.<h4>Results</h4>2104 women were randomized. Compliance with cardiac LVEF assessments was 70% at 5 years in all arms. The 5-year cumulative risks of any cardiac event for CEF, ddECT, and AC/T were 22.3% (95%CI 18.9 to 25.7), 14.2% (95%CI 11.0 to 17.3), and 8.1% (95%CI 5.8 to 10.4), respectively, p < 0.0001. At 5 years, women in the ddEC/T and AC/T group had significantly lower risk of cardiotoxicity than those given CEF (HR 0.599 and 0.371, respectively). Most events were asymptomatic drop in LVEF.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Asymptomatic changes in LVEF accounted for most of the cardiotoxicity. The majority of cardiac events occurred in year one although occurrence of cardiotoxicity over time highlights the need for improved risk stratification to guide cardiac surveillance strategies.
Authors
Dent, SF; Botros, J; Rushton, M; Aseyev, O; Levine, MN; Parulekar, WR; O'Brien, P; Burnell, M; Pritchard, KI; Chen, BE; Shepherd, LE
MLA Citation
Dent, S. F., et al. “Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with early-stage breast cancer: the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) MA.21 experience.Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 184, no. 3, Dec. 2020, pp. 733–41. Epmc, doi:10.1007/s10549-020-05887-w.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1460898
PMID
32940847
Source
epmc
Published In
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume
184
Published Date
Start Page
733
End Page
741
DOI
10.1007/s10549-020-05887-w

Cardio-Oncology Education and Training: JACC Council Perspectives.

The innovative development of cancer therapies has led to an unprecedented improvement in survival outcomes and a wide array of treatment-related toxicities, including those that are cardiovascular in nature. Aging of the population further adds to the number of patients being treated for cancer, especially those with comorbidities. Such pre-existing and developing cardiovascular diseases pose some of the greatest risks of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Addressing the complex cardiovascular needs of these patients has become increasingly important, resulting in an imperative for an intersecting discipline: cardio-oncology. Over the past decade, there has been a remarkable rise of cardio-oncology clinics and service lines. This development, however, has occurred in a vacuum of standard practice and training guidelines, although these are being actively pursued. In this council perspective document, the authors delineate the scope of practice in cardio-oncology and the proposed training requirements, as well as the necessary core competencies. This document also serves as a roadmap toward confirming cardio-oncology as a subspecialty in medicine.
Authors
Alvarez-Cardona, JA; Ray, J; Carver, J; Zaha, V; Cheng, R; Yang, E; Mitchell, JD; Stockerl-Goldstein, K; Kondapalli, L; Dent, S; Arnold, A; Brown, SA; Leja, M; Barac, A; Lenihan, DJ; Herrmann, J; Cardio-Oncology Leadership Council,
MLA Citation
Alvarez-Cardona, Jose A., et al. “Cardio-Oncology Education and Training: JACC Council Perspectives.J Am Coll Cardiol, vol. 76, no. 19, Nov. 2020, pp. 2267–81. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.079.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1464079
PMID
33153587
Source
pubmed
Published In
J Am Coll Cardiol
Volume
76
Published Date
Start Page
2267
End Page
2281
DOI
10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.079

Cardio-oncology care in the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: An International Cardio-Oncology Society (ICOS) statement.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has given rise to a pandemic of unprecedented proportions in the modern era because of its highly contagious nature and impact on human health and society: coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and established CV disease (CVD) are among those initially identified at the highest risk for serious complications, including death. Subsequent studies have pointed out that patients with cancer are also at high risk for a critical disease course. Therefore, the most vulnerable patients are seemingly those with both cancer and CVD, and a careful, unified approach in the evaluation and management of this patient population is especially needed in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. This review provides an overview of the unique implications of the viral outbreak for the field of cardio-oncology and outlines key modifications in the approach to this ever-increasing patient population. These modifications include a shift toward greater utilization of cardiac biomarkers and a more focused CV imaging approach in the broader context of modifications to typical practice pathways. The goal of this strategic adjustment is to minimize the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (or other future viral outbreaks) while not becoming negligent of CVD and its important impact on the overall outcomes of patients who are being treated for cancer.
Authors
Lenihan, D; Carver, J; Porter, C; Liu, JE; Dent, S; Thavendiranathan, P; Mitchell, JD; Nohria, A; Fradley, MG; Pusic, I; Stockerl-Goldstein, K; Blaes, A; Lyon, AR; Ganatra, S; López-Fernández, T; O'Quinn, R; Minotti, G; Szmit, S; Cardinale, D; Alvarez-Cardona, J; Curigliano, G; Neilan, TG; Herrmann, J
MLA Citation
Lenihan, Daniel, et al. “Cardio-oncology care in the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: An International Cardio-Oncology Society (ICOS) statement.Ca Cancer J Clin, vol. 70, no. 6, Nov. 2020, pp. 480–504. Pubmed, doi:10.3322/caac.21635.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1460013
PMID
32910493
Source
pubmed
Published In
Ca: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Volume
70
Published Date
Start Page
480
End Page
504
DOI
10.3322/caac.21635