Annick Desjardins

Positions:

Associate Professor of Neurosurgery

Neurosurgery, Neuro-Oncology
School of Medicine

Associate Professor in Neurology

Neurology, General & Community Neurology
School of Medicine

Member of the Duke Cancer Institute

Duke Cancer Institute
School of Medicine

Education:

M.D. 1998

University of Sherbrooke

Resident, Neurology

University of Sherbrooke

Fellow in Neuro-Oncology, Medicine

Duke University

Grants:

Phase 3 randomized, open-label study to evaluate Eflornithine with Lomustine compared to Lomustine (STELLAR) alone in patients with Anaplastic Astrocytoma

Administered By
Duke Cancer Institute
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Ph1 Study of Marizomib and Bevacizumab-Naive Subjects with Grade IV Malignant Glioma

Administered By
Duke Cancer Institute
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Phase 1b, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Marizomib with Temozolomide and Radiotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed WHO Grade IV Malignant Glioma

Administered By
Duke Cancer Institute
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

A Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of PF-06840003 in Patients with Malignant Glioma

Administered By
Duke Cancer Institute
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Phase 2 study of SYM004 for adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma

Administered By
Duke Cancer Institute
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Publications:

Second primary cancers in long-term survivors of glioblastoma.

Background: Overall survival (OS) in glioblastoma (GBM) is poor at an average of 14 to 18 months, and long-term survivors (LTS) of GBM are rare. LTS of GBM, defined as surviving >5 years postdiagnosis, represent only 2% to 10% of all GBM patients. LTS of cancer are at high risk of developing second primary neoplasms. This study looks at occurrences of second primary neoplasms in LTS of GBM. Methods: Records from adult patients newly diagnosed with GBM between January 1, 1998 and February 8, 2010, were retrospectively reviewed to identify LTS, defined as patients who survived ≥5 years. We focused on the identification of a new diagnosis of cancer occurring at least 2 years after the initial GBM diagnosis. Results: We identified 155 LTS of GBM, with a median OS of 11.0 years (95% CI: 9.0 to 13.1 years) and a median follow-up of 9.6 years (95% CI: 8.7 to 10.7 years). In this cohort of patients, 13 (8.4%) LTS of GBM developed 17 secondary cancers. Eight could potentially be attributed to previous radiation and chemotherapy (skin cancer in radiation field [n = 4], leukemia [n = 2], low-grade glioma [n = 1], and sarcoma of the scalp [n = 1]). The other 9 cases included melanoma (n = 2), prostate cancer (n = 2), bladder cancer (n = 1), endometrioid adenocarcinoma (n = 1), basal cell carcinoma (n = 1), and renal cell carcinoma (n = 1). Conclusions: Although second primary cancers are rare in GBM LTS, providers should continue close monitoring with appropriate oncologic care. Moreover, this highlights the need for survivorship care of patients with GBM.
Authors
Kim, J-Y; Jackman, JG; Woodring, S; McSherry, F; Herndon, JE; Desjardins, A; Friedman, HS; Peters, KB
MLA Citation
Kim, Jung-Young, et al. “Second primary cancers in long-term survivors of glioblastoma..” Neurooncol Pract, vol. 6, no. 5, Sept. 2019, pp. 386–91. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/nop/npz001.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1411790
PMID
31555453
Source
pubmed
Published In
Neuro Oncology Practice
Volume
6
Published Date
Start Page
386
End Page
391
DOI
10.1093/nop/npz001

Randomized open-label phase II trial of 5-day aprepitant plus ondansetron compared to ondansetron alone in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea-vomiting (CINV) in glioma patients receiving adjuvant temozolomide.

PURPOSE: CINV remains a distressing side effect experienced by glioma patients receiving multi-day temozolomide therapy, in spite of guideline-based antiemetic therapy with selective serotonin-receptor-antagonists. Antiemetic research with aprepitant has routinely excluded glioma patients. In this randomized open-label phase II study, use of a nonstandard 5-day regimen of aprepitant for glioma patients was investigated. METHODS: One hundred thirty-six glioma patients receiving their first cycle of adjuvant temozolomide (150-200 mg/m2/day × 5 days every 28 days) were randomized to Arm-A (ondansetron 8 mg days 1-5 with aprepitant day 1: 125 mg, days 2-5: 80 mg) or Arm-B (ondansetron). Randomization was stratified by tumor grade and number of prior chemotherapy regimens. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving complete control (CC), defined as no emetic episode or antiemetic rescue medication over the 7-day study period. Secondary endpoints included CINV efficacy in the acute phase (≤ 24 h) and delayed phase (days 2-7), as well as safety and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Patients were 61% male, 97% white, 48% with KPS > 90%, 60% non-smokers, mean age 54, 92% with low alcohol use, and 46% with a CINV history. The CC was 58.6% (Arm-A) and 54.5% (Arm-B). Acute-complete response (CR) rates, defined as CC on day 1 in Arm-A and -B, were 97.1% and 87.9%, respectively (p = 0.056). Treatment-related toxicities were mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Aprepitant plus ondansetron may increase acute-CR, may have benefit regarding CINV's effect on QoL, and is safe for 5-day temozolomide compared to ondansetron. This study provides no evidence that aprepitant increases CC rate over ondansetron alone.
Authors
Patel, MP; Woodring, S; Randazzo, DM; Friedman, HS; Desjardins, A; Healy, P; Herndon, JE; McSherry, F; Lipp, ES; Miller, E; Peters, KB; Affronti, ML
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1406357
PMID
31440823
Source
pubmed
Published In
Support Care Cancer
Published Date
DOI
10.1007/s00520-019-05039-x

Phase I/II trial of vorinostat, bevacizumab, and daily temozolomide for recurrent malignant gliomas.

Prognosis of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is poor with 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) ranging from 9 to 48% depending on the treatment regimen and use of anti-angiogenic therapies. We sought to study vorinostat (VOR), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in combination with bevacizumab (BEV) and daily metronomic temozolomide (TMZ) in a Phase I/II trial in recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGGs). This was a Phase I/II open-label, single-arm study in recurrent HGG patients. Phase I primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of VOR with BEV and daily TMZ. Phase II primary endpoint was PFS6. Regimen was BEV 10 mg/kg iv every 2 weeks, TMZ 50 mg/m2 po daily, and VOR 200 or 400 mg po alternating 7 days on then 7 days off throughout a 28-day cycle. Phase I portion enrolled nine subjects with three receiving VOR 200 mg and 6 receiving VOR 400 mg. With no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at 200 mg and one DLT (thrombocytopenia, Grade 3) at 400 mg, the MTD was 400 mg. Phase II portion enrolled 39 GBM subjects, and PFS6 was 53.8% (95% CI 37.2-67.9%). Of note, 14 subjects had received prior BEV and all had received prior 5-day TMZ. Combination therapy with VOR, BEV, and daily TMZ was well tolerated and safe. While PFS6 was not statistically improved beyond historical controls, it is important to note that this was a heavily pretreated GBM population and further consideration is warranted in a less pretreated group.
Authors
Peters, KB; Lipp, ES; Miller, E; Herndon, JE; McSherry, F; Desjardins, A; Reardon, DA; Friedman, HS
MLA Citation
Peters, Katherine B., et al. “Phase I/II trial of vorinostat, bevacizumab, and daily temozolomide for recurrent malignant gliomas..” J Neurooncol, vol. 137, no. 2, Apr. 2018, pp. 349–56. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/s11060-017-2724-1.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1292729
PMID
29264836
Source
pubmed
Published In
J Neurooncol
Volume
137
Published Date
Start Page
349
End Page
356
DOI
10.1007/s11060-017-2724-1

Neuro-oncology: What is the optimal use of bevacizumab in glioblastoma?

Authors
MLA Citation
Desjardins, Annick. “Neuro-oncology: What is the optimal use of bevacizumab in glioblastoma?.” Nat Rev Neurol, vol. 11, no. 8, Aug. 2015, pp. 429–30. Pubmed, doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.127.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1080602
PMID
26195258
Source
pubmed
Published In
Nat Rev Neurol
Volume
11
Published Date
Start Page
429
End Page
430
DOI
10.1038/nrneurol.2015.127

AT-19 * SINGLE INSTITUTION RETROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF GLIOBLASTOMA (GBM) PATIENTS (PTS) INITIATED ON BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) BEFORE VERSUS AFTER RECURRENCE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Authors
Desjardins, A; Herndon, J; McSherry, F; Ravelo, A; Lipp, E; Healy, P; Boulton, S; Peters, K; Vlahovic, G; Sampson, J; Friedman, A; Friedman, H
MLA Citation
Desjardins, A., et al. “AT-19 * SINGLE INSTITUTION RETROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF GLIOBLASTOMA (GBM) PATIENTS (PTS) INITIATED ON BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) BEFORE VERSUS AFTER RECURRENCE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE.” Neuro Oncology, vol. 16, no. suppl 5, Oxford University Press (OUP), Nov. 2014, pp. v12–v12. Crossref, doi:10.1093/neuonc/nou237.19.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1071022
Source
crossref
Published In
Neuro Oncology
Volume
16
Published Date
Start Page
v12
End Page
v12
DOI
10.1093/neuonc/nou237.19