Scott Floyd

PURPOSE: Current systemic therapy guidelines for patients with HER2 + breast cancer brain metastases (BCBrM) diverge based on the status of extracranial disease (ECD). An in-depth understanding of the impact of ECD on outcomes in HER2 + BCBrM has never been performed. Our study explores the implications of ECD status on intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and overall survival (OS) after first incidence of HER2 + BCBrM and radiation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 151 patients diagnosed with initial HER2 + BCBrM who received radiation therapy to the central nervous system (CNS) at Duke between 2008 and 2021. The primary endpoint was iPFS defined as the time from first CNS radiation treatment to intracranial progression or death. OS was defined as the time from first CNS radiation or first metastatic disease to death. Systemic staging scans within 30 days of initial BCBrM defined ECD status as progressive, stable/responding or none (isolated brain relapse). RESULTS: In this cohort, > 70% of patients had controlled ECD with either isolated brain relapse (27%) or stable/responding ECD (44%). OS from initial metastatic disease to death was markedly worse for patients with isolated intracranial relapse (median = 28.4 m) compared to those with progressive or stable/responding ECD (48.8 m and 71.5 m, respectively, p = 0.0028). OS from first CNS radiation to death was significantly worse for patients with progressive ECD (16.9 m) versus stable/responding (36.6 m) or isolated intracranial relapse (28.4 m, p = 0.007). iPFS did not differ statistically based on ECD status. Receipt of systemic therapy after first BCBrM significantly improved iPFS (HR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.25-0.81, p = 0.008) and OS (HR: 0.43 (95% CI: 0.23-0.81); p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: OS in patients with HER2 + isolated BCBrM was inferior to those with concurrent progressive or stable/responding ECD. Studies investigating initiation of brain-penetrable HER2-targeted therapies earlier in the disease course of isolated HER2 + intracranial relapse patients are warranted.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a standard of care for many patients with brain metastases. To optimize post-SRS surveillance, this study aimed to validate a previously published nomogram predicting post-SRS intracranial progression (IP). We identified consecutive patients completing an initial course of SRS across two institutions between July 2017 and December 2020. Patients were classified as low- or high-risk for post-SRS IP per a previously published nomogram. Overall survival (OS) and freedom from IP (FFIP) were assessed via the Kaplan-Meier method. Assessment of parameters impacting FFIP was performed with univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Among 890 patients, median follow-up was 9.8 months (95% CI 9.1-11.2 months). In total, 47% had NSCLC primary tumors, and 47% had oligometastatic disease (defined as ≤5 metastastic foci) at the time of SRS. Per the IP nomogram, 53% of patients were deemed high-risk. For low- and high-risk patients, median FFIP was 13.9 months (95% CI 11.1-17.1 months) and 7.6 months (95% CI 6.4-9.3 months), respectively, and FFIP was superior in low-risk patients (p < 0.0001). This large multisite BM cohort supports the use of an IP nomogram as a quick and simple means of stratifying patients into low- and high-risk groups for post-SRS IP.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a highly effective therapy for newly diagnosed brain metastases. Prophylactic antiepileptic drugs are no longer routinely used in current SRS practice, owing to a perceived low overall frequency of new-onset seizures and potential side effects of medications. It is nonetheless desirable to prevent unwanted side effects following SRS. Risk factors for new-onset seizures after SRS have not been well established. As such, we aimed to characterize variables associated with increased seizure risk. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated with SRS for newly diagnosed brain metastases between 2013 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed at a single institution. Data on baseline demographics, radiation parameters, and clinical courses were collected. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 305 patients treated with SRS without prior seizure history. Median age and baseline Karnofsky Performance Scale score were 64 years (interquartile range, 55-70) and 80 (interquartile range, 80-90), respectively. Twenty-six (8.5%) patients developed new-onset seizures within 3 months of SRS. There was no association between new-onset seizures and median baseline Karnofsky Performance Scale score, prior resection, or prior whole brain radiation therapy. There were significant differences in the combined total irradiated volume (12.5 vs 3.7 cm3, P < .001), maximum single lesion volume (8.8 vs 2.8 cm3, P = .003), lesion diameter (3.2 vs 2.0 cm, P = .003), and number of lesions treated (3 vs 1, P = .018) between patients with and without new-onset seizures, respectively. On multivariate logistic regression, total irradiated volume (odds ratio, 1.09 for every 1-cm1 increase in total volume; confidence interval, 1.02-1.17; P = .016) and pre-SRS neurologic symptoms (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-7.99; P = .020) were both significantly correlated with odds of seizures following SRS. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that larger total treatment volume and the presence of focal neurologic deficits at presentation are associated with new-onset seizures within 3 months of SRS. High-risk patients undergoing SRS may benefit from counseling or prophylactic antiseizure therapy.

<jats:p> e14002 </jats:p><jats:p> Background: It is estimated that 30% of patients with metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer will develop brain metastases. Current standard of care options for HER2+ breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBrM) includes radiation therapy (stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS] or whole brain radiation), brain permeable systemic therapies, and in select cases, neurosurgical resection. A multimodal approach combining these different treatment modalities has improved the overall survival and functional outcomes of patients with BCBrM. Some HER2-directed systemic therapies, however, may increase the risk of radiation necrosis (RN), a longer-term consequence of SRS. This study explores the impact of timing and type of systemic therapies on the development of RN in patients treated with SRS for HER2+ BCBrM. Methods: This was a single-institution, retrospective study including patients ≥18 years of age with HER2+ BCBrM who received SRS between 2013 and 2018 at Duke University with at least 12-month post-SRS follow-up. Presence of RN was determined at one-year post-SRS. Demographics, radiotherapy parameters (total dose, fractions, clinical target volume [CTV], gross tumor volume [GTV], conformity index [CI], volume receiving 12 gray [V12Gy]), and timing (during [within 4 weeks of SRS] vs. not during SRS) and type of systemic therapy (HER2-directed therapy, mitosis inhibitors, DNA synthesis inhibitors, others) were evaluated. Results: Among 46 patients with HER2+ BCBrM who received SRS, 28 (60.9%) developed RN and 18 (39.1%) did not. Age at time of SRS did not differ between those who developed RN and those who did not (mean 53.3 vs 50.4 years, respectively). There was a higher percentage of African Americans in the RN group (28.6% vs 11.1%, p = 0.3). There were no significant differences between the measured radiotherapy parameters—including dose, fraction, CTV, GTV, CI, V12Gy—between the two groups (all p &gt; 0.05). Receipt of any type of systemic therapy during SRS did not differ between patients who did or did not develop RN (60.7% vs 55.6%, p = 0.97). However, patients who developed RN more commonly received more than one line of HER2-directed therapy independent of SRS timing compared to those who did not develop RN (75.0% vs 44.4%, p = 0.08). In fact, a significantly higher proportion of those who developed RN received more than one line of HER2-directed therapy during SRS compared to those did not develop RN (35.7% vs 5.6%, p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: Patients with HER2 BCBrM who receive multiple lines of HER2-directed therapy during SRS for BCBrM may be at higher risk of RN. This data supports a practice of holding HER2-directed therapy during SRS if medically acceptable. Further investigation of next generation HER2-directed therapies in a larger cohort of patients should be investigated to help guide best practice to minimize RN. </jats:p>

<jats:p> 1041 </jats:p><jats:p> Background: BCBMs are very common in metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. CNS-directed local therapy is the gold standard for treatment, followed by systemic HER2-targeted therapies. In patients with HER2+ BCBM and stable extracranial disease (ECD), consensus guidelines recommend continuing current systemic therapy after local therapy. Our goal was to determine the implications of ECD status at time of HER2+ BCBM first CNS involvement on outcomes including intracranial progression-free survival (PFS1) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on data extracted from 77 patients with HER2+ BCBM who received CNS radiation at Duke between 2006 and 2020 following initial documentation of CNS involvement. Demographics, dates of metastatic and intracranial diagnosis, ECD status at first CNS involvement, systemic therapy, and outcomes were collected. The primary endpoint was PFS1 defined as the time from first CNS radiation to the subsequent documentation of intracranial progression (RANO-BM). OS was defined as time from first CNS radiation and first metastatic disease to date of death or last known alive. ECD status was defined by RECIST1.1 from systemic staging scans within 30 days of first CNS involvement. Results: In this patient cohort of HER2+ BCBMs undergoing CNS radiation at first CNS involvement, &gt;50% of patients had extracranial disease control: no ECD (25%) or stable/responding disease (31%). 52% of patients’ tumors were ER+. Median age was 50 years (range 27 – 75). Most patients (58%) developed first CNS involvement during adjuvant or first/second line metastatic therapy. For first CNS radiation, 49% received SRS and 48% WBRT. All patients with no ECD presented with isolated CNS disease as first metastatic presentation. Median OS in this cohort from initial metastatic disease to death was markedly worse for patients with no ECD (25.3m, 95% CI: 16.8 to 35.3) compared to those with progressive or stable/responding ECD (48.8m, 95% CI: 28.1 to 65; and 52.9 months, 95% CI: 43.7 to 73.3, respectively; p=0.03). Median OS from first CNS involvement to death was not statistically different amongst groups. This analysis did not detect median PFS1 differences based on ECD after first CNS radiation: progressive ECD (6.3m), no ECD (8.7m), or stable/responding ECD (10.6m) (p=0.13), though clinically meaningful differences were observed. Conclusions: Patients with isolated HER2+ BCBM with no ECD at the time of their initial CNS involvement (25% of population) have substantially worse OS compared to patients who present with ECD and develop CNS metastases later in their disease course. This population with isolated CNS disease at metastatic presentation deserves investigation of novel treatment algorithms, including earlier introduction of brain penetrable HER2-targeted agents. </jats:p>