Shiao-Wen David Hsu
Positions:
Associate Professor of Medicine
Medicine, Medical Oncology
School of Medicine
William Dalton Family Assistant Professor of Medical Oncology, in the School of Medicine
Medicine, Medical Oncology
School of Medicine
Member of the Duke Cancer Institute
Duke Cancer Institute
School of Medicine
Education:
M.D. 2001
University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Medical Resident, Medicine
University of Texas at Dallas
Fellow in Hematology-Oncology, Medicine
Duke University
Grants:
Identifying gene-environment interactions that confer metabolic vulnerabilities in cancer
Administered By
Pharmacology & Cancer Biology
Awarded By
National Institutes of Health
Role
Collaborator
Start Date
End Date
Targeting KRAS (G12C) Mutant in Colorectal Cancer
Administered By
Medicine, Medical Oncology
Awarded By
Amgen, Inc.
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date
Determining the Efficacy of Liposomal Gemcitabine in Patient Derived Xenografts (PDXs)
Administered By
Medicine, Medical Oncology
Awarded By
FUJIFILM Pharmaceuticals U.S.A.
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date
Targeting the TK1 receptor in colorectal and lung PDX using CarT cell and Motorcar cell
Administered By
Medicine, Medical Oncology
Awarded By
Thunder Biotech
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date
Targeting Calreticulin in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis
Administered By
Medicine, Medical Oncology
Awarded By
National Institutes of Health
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date
Publications:
Novel adenoviral vector induces T-cell responses despite anti-adenoviral neutralizing antibodies in colorectal cancer patients.
First-generation, E1-deleted adenovirus subtype 5 (Ad5)-based vectors, although promising platforms for use as cancer vaccines, are impeded in activity by naturally occurring or induced Ad-specific neutralizing antibodies. Ad5-based vectors with deletions of the E1 and the E2b regions (Ad5 [E1-, E2b-]), the latter encoding the DNA polymerase and the pre-terminal protein, by virtue of diminished late phase viral protein expression, were hypothesized to avoid immunological clearance and induce more potent immune responses against the encoded tumor antigen transgene in Ad-immune hosts. Indeed, multiple homologous immunizations with Ad5 [E1-, E2b-]-CEA(6D), encoding the tumor antigen carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), induced CEA-specific cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses with antitumor activity in mice despite the presence of preexisting or induced Ad5-neutralizing antibody. In the present phase I/II study, cohorts of patients with advanced colorectal cancer were immunized with escalating doses of Ad5 [E1-, E2b-]-CEA(6D). CEA-specific CMI responses were observed despite the presence of preexisting Ad5 immunity in a majority (61.3 %) of patients. Importantly, there was minimal toxicity, and overall patient survival (48 % at 12 months) was similar regardless of preexisting Ad5 neutralizing antibody titers. The results demonstrate that, in cancer patients, the novel Ad5 [E1-, E2b-] gene delivery platform generates significant CMI responses to the tumor antigen CEA in the setting of both naturally acquired and immunization-induced Ad5-specific immunity.
Authors
Morse, MA; Chaudhry, A; Gabitzsch, ES; Hobeika, AC; Osada, T; Clay, TM; Amalfitano, A; Burnett, BK; Devi, GR; Hsu, DS; Xu, Y; Balcaitis, S; Dua, R; Nguyen, S; Balint, JP; Jones, FR; Lyerly, HK
MLA Citation
Morse, Michael A., et al. “Novel adenoviral vector induces T-cell responses despite anti-adenoviral neutralizing antibodies in colorectal cancer patients.” Cancer Immunol Immunother, vol. 62, no. 8, Aug. 2013, pp. 1293–301. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/s00262-013-1400-3.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub941182
PMID
23624851
Source
pubmed
Published In
Cancer Immunol Immunother
Volume
62
Published Date
Start Page
1293
End Page
1301
DOI
10.1007/s00262-013-1400-3
CSPG4 protein as a new target for the antibody-based immunotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer.
BACKGROUND: The cell surface proteoglycan, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4), is a potential target for monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based immunotherapy for many types of cancer. The lack of effective therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) prompted us to examine whether CSPG4 is expressed in TNBC and can be targeted with CSPG4-specific mAb. METHODS: CSPG4 protein expression was assessed in 44 primary TNBC lesions, in TNBC cell lines HS578T, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435, and SUM149, and in tumor cells in pleural effusions from 12 metastatic breast cancer patients. The effect of CSPG4-specific mAb 225.28 on growth, adhesion, and migration of TNBC cells was tested in vitro. The ability of mAb 225.28 to induce regression of tumor metastases (n = 7 mice) and to inhibit spontaneous metastasis and tumor recurrence (n = 12 mice per group) was tested in breast cancer models in mice. The mechanisms responsible for the antitumor effect of mAb 225.28 were also investigated in the cell lines and in the mouse models. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: CSPG4 protein was preferentially expressed in 32 of the 44 (72.7%) primary TNBC lesions tested, in TNBC cell lines, and in tumor cells in pleural effusions from 12 metastatic breast cancer patients. CSPG4-specific mAb 225.28 statistically significantly inhibited growth, adhesion, and migration of TNBC cells in vitro. mAb 225.28 induced 73.1% regression of tumor metastasis in a TNBC cell-derived experimental lung metastasis model (mAb 225.28 vs control, mean area of metastatic nodules = 44590.8 vs 165950.8 μm(2); difference of mean = 121360.0 μm(2), 95% confidence interval = 91010.7 to 151709.4 μm(2); P < .001). Additionally, mAb 225.28 statistically significantly reduced spontaneous lung metastases and tumor recurrences in an orthotopic xenograft mouse model. The mechanisms responsible for antitumor effect included increased apoptosis and reduced mitotic activity in tumor cells, decreased blood vessel density in the tumor microenvironment, and reduced activation of signaling pathways involved in cell survival, proliferation and metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified CSPG4 as a new target for TNBC. The antitumor activity of CSPG4-specific mAb was mediated by multiple mechanisms, including the inhibition of signaling pathways crucial for TNBC cell survival, proliferation, and metastasis.
Authors
Wang, X; Osada, T; Wang, Y; Yu, L; Sakakura, K; Katayama, A; McCarthy, JB; Brufsky, A; Chivukula, M; Khoury, T; Hsu, DS; Barry, WT; Lyerly, HK; Clay, TM; Ferrone, S
MLA Citation
Wang, Xinhui, et al. “CSPG4 protein as a new target for the antibody-based immunotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer.” J Natl Cancer Inst, vol. 102, no. 19, Oct. 2010, pp. 1496–512. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/jnci/djq343.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub777456
PMID
20852124
Source
pubmed
Published In
J Natl Cancer Inst
Volume
102
Published Date
Start Page
1496
End Page
1512
DOI
10.1093/jnci/djq343
Putative human blue-light photoreceptors hCRY1 and hCRY2 are flavoproteins.
Recently, a human cDNA clone with high sequence homology to the photolyase/blue-light photoreceptor family was identified. The putative protein encoded by this gene exhibited a strikingly high (48% identity) degree of homology to the Drosophila melanogaster (6-4) photolyase [Todo et al. (1996) Science 272, 109-112]. We have now identified a second human gene whose amino acid sequence displays 73% identity to the first one and have named the two genes CRY1 and CRY2, respectively. The corresponding proteins hCRY1 and hCRY2 were purified and characterized as maltose-binding fusion proteins. Similar to other members of the photolyase/blue-light photoreceptor family, both proteins were found to contain FAD and a pterin cofactor. Like the plant blue-light photoreceptors, both hCRY1 and hCRY2 lacked photolyase activity on the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer and the (6-4) photoproduct. We conclude that these newly discovered members of the photolyase/photoreceptor family are not photolyases and instead may function as blue-light photoreceptors in humans.
MLA Citation
Hsu, D. S., et al. “Putative human blue-light photoreceptors hCRY1 and hCRY2 are flavoproteins.” Biochemistry, vol. 35, no. 44, Nov. 1996, pp. 13871–77. Pubmed, doi:10.1021/bi962209o.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub777461
PMID
8909283
Source
pubmed
Published In
Biochemistry
Volume
35
Published Date
Start Page
13871
End Page
13877
DOI
10.1021/bi962209o
Modest advances in survival for patients with colorectal-associated peritoneal carcinomatosis in the era of modern chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND: The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has evolved rapidly over the last decade, with combination chemotherapy and targeted biologic agents leading to significant improvements in survival. Despite these advances, little is known about their effectiveness in CRC-associated peritoneal carcinomatosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with CRC-associated PC treated in the era of modern chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed an institutional tumor database from 1996 to 2008. Survival data were evaluated for patients treated with PC before and after 2003. No patients before 2003 were treated with combination chemotherapy or biologic therapy. The modern chemotherapy group consisted of patients treated after 2003. Survival curves were estimated. RESULTS: Overall, 173 patients were identified. Median follow-up was 8.6 months. Median survival in the historic group (n = 91) was 8.9 months and 16.3 months in the modern chemotherapy group (n = 82) (P < 0.004). Age was the only significant covariate. The survival difference between the modern chemotherapy cohort and control cohort persisted after adjustment for age. In a subset of patients in the modern chemotherapy era group, for which treatment regimen could be definitively identified, survival was even greater-23.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CRC-associated PC treated with modern combination chemotherapy and biologic therapy have a significantly longer median survival compared to our historical cohort. Despite these improvements, outcomes still remain poor. Therapeutic adjuncts such as surgical cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in appropriately selected patients remain promising options to improve outcomes for patients with peritoneal-based disease.
Authors
Zani, S; Papalezova, K; Stinnett, S; Tyler, D; Hsu, D; Blazer, DG
MLA Citation
Zani, Sabino, et al. “Modest advances in survival for patients with colorectal-associated peritoneal carcinomatosis in the era of modern chemotherapy.” J Surg Oncol, vol. 107, no. 4, Mar. 2013, pp. 307–11. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/jso.23222.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub761002
PMID
22811275
Source
pubmed
Published In
J Surg Oncol
Volume
107
Published Date
Start Page
307
End Page
311
DOI
10.1002/jso.23222
Immune signatures predict prognosis in localized cancer.
The host immune response can impact cancer growth, prognosis, and response to therapy. In colorectal cancer, the presence of cells involved with T-cell-mediated adaptive immunity predicts survival better than the current staging method. We used the expression of genes recently associated with host immune responses (T(H1)-mediated adaptive immunity, inflammation, and immune suppression) to perform hierarchical clustering of multiple large cohorts of cancer specimens to determine if immune-related gene expression resulted in clinical significant groupings of tumors. Microarray data from prostate cancer (n = 79), breast cancer (n = 132), lung cancer (n = 84), glioblastoma multiforme (n = 120), and lymphoma (n = 127) were analyzed. Among adenocarcinomas, the T(H1)-mediated adaptive immunity genes were consistently associated with better prognosis, while genes associated with inflammation and immune suppression were variably associated with outcome. Specifically, increased expression of the T(H1)-mediated adaptive immunity genes was associated with good prognosis in breast cancer patients under 45 years of age (p = .04, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.42) and in prostate cancer patients (p = .03, HR = 0.36) but not in lung cancer patients (p = 0.45, HR = 1.37). In lymphoma, patients with increased expression of inflammation and immune suppression genes had better prognosis than those expressing the T(H1)-mediated adaptive immunity genes (p = .01, HR = 0.43) and in glioblastoma multiforme, the expression of inflammation genes conferred improved prognosis than those expressing immune suppression genes (p = 0.05, HR = 0.62). In aggregate, the gene expression signatures implicating specific components of the immune response hold prognostic import across solid tumors.
Authors
Hsu, DS; Kim, MK; Balakumaran, BS; Acharya, CR; Anders, CK; Clay, T; Lyerly, HK; Drake, CG; Morse, MA; Febbo, PG
MLA Citation
Hsu, David S., et al. “Immune signatures predict prognosis in localized cancer.” Cancer Invest, vol. 28, no. 7, Aug. 2010, pp. 765–73. Pubmed, doi:10.3109/07357900903095755.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub726566
PMID
20569070
Source
pubmed
Published In
Cancer Invest
Volume
28
Published Date
Start Page
765
End Page
773
DOI
10.3109/07357900903095755

Associate Professor of Medicine
Contact:
Dept of Medicine, Box 3233, Durham, NC 27710
Duke Box 3233, Durham, NC 27710