John Kirkpatrick

Overview:

Malignant and benign tumors of the brain, spine and base of skull. Mathematical modelling of tumor metabolism, mass transfer and the response to ionizing radiation. Enhancing clinical outcome in stereotactic radiosurgery, fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Positions:

Professor of Radiation Oncology

Radiation Oncology
School of Medicine

Professor in Neurosurgery

Neurosurgery
School of Medicine

Member of the Duke Cancer Institute

Duke Cancer Institute
School of Medicine

Education:

Ph.D. 1978

Rice University

M.D. 1999

University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio

Grants:

Validation of Novel Therapeutic Approach for Leptomeningeal Metastases

Administered By
Neurosurgery
Role
Investigator
Start Date
End Date

BMX-001 AS A THERAPEUTIC AGENT FOR TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE BRAIN METASTASES

Administered By
Radiation Oncology
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Publications:

Prognostic Model for Intracranial Progression after Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Multicenter Validation Study.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a standard of care for many patients with brain metastases. To optimize post-SRS surveillance, this study aimed to validate a previously published nomogram predicting post-SRS intracranial progression (IP). We identified consecutive patients completing an initial course of SRS across two institutions between July 2017 and December 2020. Patients were classified as low- or high-risk for post-SRS IP per a previously published nomogram. Overall survival (OS) and freedom from IP (FFIP) were assessed via the Kaplan-Meier method. Assessment of parameters impacting FFIP was performed with univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Among 890 patients, median follow-up was 9.8 months (95% CI 9.1-11.2 months). In total, 47% had NSCLC primary tumors, and 47% had oligometastatic disease (defined as ≤5 metastastic foci) at the time of SRS. Per the IP nomogram, 53% of patients were deemed high-risk. For low- and high-risk patients, median FFIP was 13.9 months (95% CI 11.1-17.1 months) and 7.6 months (95% CI 6.4-9.3 months), respectively, and FFIP was superior in low-risk patients (p < 0.0001). This large multisite BM cohort supports the use of an IP nomogram as a quick and simple means of stratifying patients into low- and high-risk groups for post-SRS IP.
Authors
Carpenter, DJ; Natarajan, B; Arshad, M; Natesan, D; Schultz, O; Moravan, MJ; Read, C; Lafata, KJ; Giles, W; Fecci, P; Mullikin, TC; Reitman, ZJ; Kirkpatrick, JP; Floyd, SR; Chmura, SJ; Hong, JC; Salama, JK
MLA Citation
Carpenter, David J., et al. “Prognostic Model for Intracranial Progression after Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Multicenter Validation Study.Cancers (Basel), vol. 14, no. 21, Oct. 2022. Pubmed, doi:10.3390/cancers14215186.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1555466
PMID
36358606
Source
pubmed
Published In
Cancers
Volume
14
Published Date
DOI
10.3390/cancers14215186

A Deep Learning-Based Computer Aided Detection (CAD) System for Difficult-to-Detect Brain Metastases.

PURPOSE: We sought to develop a computer-aided detection (CAD) system that optimally augments human performance, excelling especially at identifying small inconspicuous brain metastases (BMs), by training a convolutional neural network on a unique magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data set containing subtle BMs that were not detected prospectively during routine clinical care. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for BMs at our institution from 2016 to 2018 without prior brain-directed therapy or small cell histology were eligible. For patients who underwent 2 consecutive courses of SRS, treatment planning MRIs from their initial course were reviewed for radiographic evidence of an emerging metastasis at the same location as metastases treated in their second SRS course. If present, these previously unidentified lesions were contoured and categorized as retrospectively identified metastases (RIMs). RIMs were further subcategorized according to whether they did (+DC) or did not (-DC) meet diagnostic imaging-based criteria to definitively classify them as metastases based upon their appearance in the initial MRI alone. Prospectively identified metastases (PIMs) from these patients, and from patients who only underwent a single course of SRS, were also included. An open-source convolutional neural network architecture was adapted and trained to detect both RIMs and PIMs on thin-slice, contrast-enhanced, spoiled gradient echo MRIs. Patients were randomized into 5 groups: 4 for training/cross-validation and 1 for testing. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five patients with 563 metastases, including 72 RIMS, met criteria. For the test group, CAD sensitivity was 94% for PIMs, 80% for +DC RIMs, and 79% for PIMs and +DC RIMs with diameter <3 mm, with a median of 2 false positives per patient and a Dice coefficient of 0.79. CONCLUSIONS: Our CAD model, trained on a novel data set and using a single common MR sequence, demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity overall, outperforming published CAD results for small metastases and RIMs - the lesion types most in need of human performance augmentation.
Authors
Fairchild, AT; Salama, JK; Wiggins, WF; Ackerson, BG; Fecci, PE; Kirkpatrick, JP; Floyd, SR; Godfrey, DJ
MLA Citation
Fairchild, Andrew T., et al. “A Deep Learning-Based Computer Aided Detection (CAD) System for Difficult-to-Detect Brain Metastases.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, Oct. 2022. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.068.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1555161
PMID
36289038
Source
pubmed
Published In
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Published Date
DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.068

Classifying Leptomeningeal Disease: An Essential Element in Managing Advanced Metastatic Disease in the Central Nervous System.

Authors
MLA Citation
Kirkpatrick, John P. “Classifying Leptomeningeal Disease: An Essential Element in Managing Advanced Metastatic Disease in the Central Nervous System.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, vol. 106, no. 3, Mar. 2020, pp. 587–88. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.12.016.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1431444
PMID
32014150
Source
pubmed
Published In
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Volume
106
Published Date
Start Page
587
End Page
588
DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.12.016

Addendum: Resolution of radiation necrosis with bevacizumab following radiation therapy for primary CNS lymphoma.

Authors
Vaios, EJ; Batich, KA; Buckley, AF; Dunn-Pirio, A; Patel, MP; Kirkpatrick, JP; Goudar, R; Peters, KB
MLA Citation
Vaios, Eugene J., et al. “Addendum: Resolution of radiation necrosis with bevacizumab following radiation therapy for primary CNS lymphoma.Oncotarget, vol. 13, Oct. 2022, p. 1165. Pubmed, doi:10.18632/oncotarget.28292.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1554967
PMID
36289014
Source
pubmed
Published In
Oncotarget
Volume
13
Published Date
Start Page
1165
DOI
10.18632/oncotarget.28292

Accurate Three-Dimensional Thermal Dosimetry and Assessment of Physiologic Response Are Essential for Optimizing Thermoradiotherapy.

Numerous randomized trials have revealed that hyperthermia (HT) + radiotherapy or chemotherapy improves local tumor control, progression free and overall survival vs. radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Despite these successes, however, some individuals fail combination therapy; not every patient will obtain maximal benefit from HT. There are many potential reasons for failure. In this paper, we focus on how HT influences tumor hypoxia, since hypoxia negatively influences radiotherapy and chemotherapy response as well as immune surveillance. Pre-clinically, it is well established that reoxygenation of tumors in response to HT is related to the time and temperature of exposure. In most pre-clinical studies, reoxygenation occurs only during or shortly after a HT treatment. If this were the case clinically, then it would be challenging to take advantage of HT induced reoxygenation. An important question, therefore, is whether HT induced reoxygenation occurs in the clinic that is of radiobiological significance. In this review, we will discuss the influence of thermal history on reoxygenation in both human and canine cancers treated with thermoradiotherapy. Results of several clinical series show that reoxygenation is observed and persists for 24-48 h after HT. Further, reoxygenation is associated with treatment outcome in thermoradiotherapy trials as assessed by: (1) a doubling of pathologic complete response (pCR) in human soft tissue sarcomas, (2) a 14 mmHg increase in pO2 of locally advanced breast cancers achieving a clinical response vs. a 9 mmHg decrease in pO2 of locally advanced breast cancers that did not respond and (3) a significant correlation between extent of reoxygenation (as assessed by pO2 probes and hypoxia marker drug immunohistochemistry) and duration of local tumor control in canine soft tissue sarcomas. The persistence of reoxygenation out to 24-48 h post HT is distinctly different from most reported rodent studies. In these clinical series, comparison of thermal data with physiologic response shows that within the same tumor, temperatures at the higher end of the temperature distribution likely kill cells, resulting in reduced oxygen consumption rate, while lower temperatures in the same tumor improve perfusion. However, reoxygenation does not occur in all subjects, leading to significant uncertainty about the thermal-physiologic relationship. This uncertainty stems from limited knowledge about the spatiotemporal characteristics of temperature and physiologic response. We conclude with recommendations for future research with emphasis on retrieving co-registered thermal and physiologic data before and after HT in order to begin to unravel complex thermophysiologic interactions that appear to occur with thermoradiotherapy.
Authors
Dewhirst, MW; Oleson, JR; Kirkpatrick, J; Secomb, TW
MLA Citation
Dewhirst, Mark W., et al. “Accurate Three-Dimensional Thermal Dosimetry and Assessment of Physiologic Response Are Essential for Optimizing Thermoradiotherapy.Cancers (Basel), vol. 14, no. 7, Mar. 2022. Pubmed, doi:10.3390/cancers14071701.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1515674
PMID
35406473
Source
pubmed
Published In
Cancers
Volume
14
Published Date
DOI
10.3390/cancers14071701