Whitney Robinson

Overview:

I design studies and interpret results from big datasets to figure out why rates of health and disease vary across groups.  More generally, I love thinking up new ways to draw causal inference from observational data.

Non-cancerous gynecologic conditions, like endometriosis, fibroids, and PCOS, are my particular focus.  They affect the well-being of a huge number of people but can be difficult to diagnose and treat.  And treatment often involves complex trade-offs regarding quality of life, fertility, and permanence of treatment effectiveness.  I typically investigate these questions using health care data that were not originally intended for research, such as electronic health records, state physician licensing data, etc.

As a Faculty Epidemiologist in the OB-GYN Department, I genuinely love seeing others thrive in their research.  I have a gift for identifying where people can add the most value on a research team. 

Positions:

Associate Professor in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Community & Population Health
School of Medicine

Core Faculty Member, Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy

Duke - Margolis Center For Health Policy
Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

Member of the Duke Cancer Institute

Duke Cancer Institute
School of Medicine

Education:

Ph.D. 2008

University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill

Grants:

Racial Differences in Treatment with Hysterectomy: a Multilevel Investigation

Administered By
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Community & Population Health
Awarded By
National Institutes of Health
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Reevaluation of TVUS to improve early detection of Endometrial Cancer among US Black women

Administered By
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Community & Population Health
Awarded By
University of Washington
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Multilevel Forms of Structural Racism and Racial Inequalities in AD/ADRD Risk

Administered By
Institutes and Provost's Academic Units
Awarded By
University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Role
Co Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Reevaluation of TVUS to improve early detection of Endometrial Cancer among US Black women

Administered By
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Community & Population Health
Awarded By
University of Washington
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Establishing a Sentinel Surveillance System for COVID-19 Disparities in North Carolina: Using Routine Antenatal Care Visits to Estimate Real-Time COVID-19 Seroprevalence in Diverse Populations

Administered By
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Community & Population Health
Awarded By
University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Publications:

Mass probation: Temporal and geographic correlation of county-level probation rates & mental health in North Carolina.

High community incarceration rates are associated with worse community mental health. However, it remains unknown whether higher rates of probation, a form of criminal legal community supervision, are similarly associated with worse community mental health. Our objective was to evaluate temporal and geographic correlations of county-level probation and mental health rates separately and to assess the association between county-level probation and mental health rates, measured by self-inflicted injury and suicide. We performed ecological analyses using North Carolina administrative data (2009-2019) and used repeated cross-section, multivariable spatial error models. From 2009 to 2019, probation rates trended downward while self-inflicted injury and suicide remained stable. We found positive spatial autocorrelation suggesting that there are spatial determinants of probation and self-harm, though less so for suicide. Hot spot analyses showed local variation with high self-harm and suicide rates being clustered in rural Western North Carolina and high probation rates being clustered in rural Eastern North Carolina. Probation was positively associated with self-inflicted injury and suicide. For example, in 2018, a 1 percentage point increase in probation was associated with a 0.05 percentage point increase in self-harm in 2019 (95% CI: 0.03, 0.06), meaning that in a county of 100,000 people, an increase in 1000 county residents being on probation would be associated with an increase in 50 self-harm injuries. High county-level probation rates may exert collateral damage on the mental health of those living in areas with much of the population under state control. These findings emphasize that the criminal legal system is not separate from communities and that future public health research and advocacy must consider these collateral consequences of probation on communities.
Authors
LeMasters, K; Delamater, P; Brinkley-Rubinstein, L; Edwards, JK; Robinson, WR; Pence, B
MLA Citation
LeMasters, Katherine, et al. “Mass probation: Temporal and geographic correlation of county-level probation rates & mental health in North Carolina.Ssm Ment Health, vol. 3, Dec. 2023. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100189.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1569612
PMID
36936811
Source
pubmed
Published In
Ssm. Mental Health
Volume
3
Published Date
DOI
10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100189

Disparities in job characteristics by race and sex in a Southern aluminum smelting facility.

BACKGROUND: Former workers at a Southern aluminum smelting facility raised concerns that the most hazardous jobs were assigned to Black workers, but the role of workplace segregation had not been quantified or examined in the company town. Prior studies discuss race and gender disparities in working conditions, but few have documented them in the aluminum industry. METHODS: We obtained workers' company records for 1985-2007 and characterized four job metrics: prestige (sociologic rankings), worker-defined danger (worker assessments), annual wage (1985 dollars), and estimated total particulate matter (TPM) exposure (job exposure matrix). Characteristics of job at hire and trajectories were compared by race and sex using linear binomial models. RESULTS: Non-White males had the highest percentage of workers in low prestige and high danger jobs at hire and up to 20 years after. After 20 years tenure, 100% of White workers were in higher prestige and lower danger jobs. Most female workers, regardless of race, entered and remained in low-wage jobs, while 50% of all male workers maintained their initial higher-wage jobs. Non-White females had the highest prevalence of workers in low-wage jobs at hire and after 20 years-increasing from 63% (95% CI: 59-67) to 100% (95% CI: 78-100). All female workers were less likely to be in high TPM exposure jobs. Non-White males were most likely to be hired into high TPM exposure jobs, and this exposure prevalence increased as time accrued, while staying constant for other race-sex groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence of job segregation by race and sex in this cohort of aluminum smelting workers. Documentation of disparities in occupational hazards is important for informing health interventions and research.
Authors
McClure, ES; Robinson, WR; Vasudevan, P; Cullen, MR; Marshall, SW; Noth, E; Richardson, D
MLA Citation
McClure, Elizabeth S., et al. “Disparities in job characteristics by race and sex in a Southern aluminum smelting facility.Am J Ind Med, vol. 66, no. 4, Apr. 2023, pp. 307–19. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/ajim.23464.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1565138
PMID
36748848
Source
pubmed
Published In
Am J Ind Med
Volume
66
Published Date
Start Page
307
End Page
319
DOI
10.1002/ajim.23464

A comparison of analytic approaches for investigating the obesity paradox in kidney cancer.

PURPOSE: Body mass index (BMI) and kidney cancer mortality are inconsistently associated in the scientific literature. To understand how study design affects results, we contrasted associations between pre-diagnosis BMI and mortality under different analytic scenarios in a large, population-based prospective cohort study. METHODS: Using data from the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study (1995-2011), we constructed two cohorts: a "full at-risk" cohort with no kidney cancer history at baseline (n = 252,845) and an "incident cancer" subset who developed kidney cancer during follow-up (n = 1,652). Cox Proportional Hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between pre-diagnosis BMI and mortality for different outcomes (all-cause and cancer-specific mortality), in the different cohorts (full at-risk vs. incident cancer cohort), and with different covariates (minimally vs. fully adjusted). For the incident cancer cohort, we also examined time to mortality using different timescales: from enrollment or diagnosis. RESULTS: In the full at-risk study population, higher pre-diagnosis BMI was associated with greater cancer-specific mortality in fully adjusted multivariable models, particularly for obese participants [HR, (95% CI): 1.76, (1.38-2.25)]. This association was less pronounced in the incident cancer cohort [1.50, (1.09-2.07)]. BMI was not strongly associated with all-cause mortality in either cohort in fully adjusted models [full cohort: 1.03, (1.01, 1.06); incident cancer cohort: 1.20, (0.97, 1.48)]. CONCLUSIONS: Populations characterized by high adult BMI will likely experience greater population burdens of mortality from kidney cancer, partially because of higher rates of kidney cancer diagnosis. Questions regarding overall mortality burden and post-diagnosis cancer survivorship are distinct and require different study designs.
Authors
Olsson, LT; Eberle, CE; Petruzella, S; Robinson, WR; Furberg, H
MLA Citation
Olsson, Linnea T., et al. “A comparison of analytic approaches for investigating the obesity paradox in kidney cancer.Cancer Causes Control, vol. 34, no. 4, Apr. 2023, pp. 361–70. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/s10552-023-01670-6.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1566798
PMID
36786871
Source
pubmed
Published In
Cancer Causes Control
Volume
34
Published Date
Start Page
361
End Page
370
DOI
10.1007/s10552-023-01670-6

Single-center serological surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant patients presenting to labor and delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To measure maternal/fetal SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels. METHODS: A prospective observational study of eligible parturients admitted to the hospital for infant delivery was conducted between April and September 2020. SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels were measured in maternal and umbilical cord specimens using an in-house ELISA based on the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein. Among SARS-CoV-2 seropositive patients, spike RBD antibody isotypes (IgG, IgM, and IgA) and ACE2 inhibiting antibodies were measured. RESULTS: In total, 402 mothers were enrolled and spike RBD antibodies in 388 pregnancies were measured (336 maternal and 52 cord specimens). Of them, 19 were positive (15 maternal, 4 cord) resulting in a seroprevalence estimate of 4.8% (95% confidence interval 2.9-7.4). Of the 15 positive maternal specimens, all had cord blood tested. Of the 15 paired specimens, 14 (93.3%) were concordant. Four of the 15 pairs were from symptomatic mothers, and all four showed high spike-ACE2 blocking antibody levels, compared to only 3 of 11 (27.3%) from asymptomatic mothers. CONCLUSION: A variable antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy among asymptomatic infections compared to symptomatic infections was found, the significance of which is unknown. Although transfer of transplacental neutralizing antibodies occurred, additional research is needed to determine how long maternal antibodies can protect the infant against SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Authors
Boggess, KA; Stringer, EM; Robinson, WR; Munoz, MC; Goodnight, WH; Rahangdale, L; Vora, NL; Rosenbaum, AJ; Bala, V; Ivins, A; Narowski, TM; Jadi, R; Premkumar, L
MLA Citation
Boggess, Kim A., et al. “Single-center serological surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant patients presenting to labor and delivery.Int J Gynaecol Obstet, vol. 160, no. 3, Mar. 2023, pp. 874–79. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/ijgo.14587.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1557745
PMID
36416412
Source
pubmed
Published In
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
Volume
160
Published Date
Start Page
874
End Page
879
DOI
10.1002/ijgo.14587

Inequities in life course criminal legal system sanctions: measuring cumulative involvement.

PURPOSE: The impact of incarceration on health is well known. Yet, most studies measure incarceration alone and miss additional exposure to the criminal legal system over time. We evaluated adult criminal legal sanctions - inclusive of arrests, charges, probation, incarceration - from ages 18-35 and inequities by juvenile sanctions and race. METHODS: Using the National Longitudinal Survey on Youth 1997, a nationally representative data set of adolescents followed into their mid-thirties (1997-2017), we calculated the mean cumulative count, or the average number of criminal legal events per person per study visit, stratified by juvenile sanctions and race. RESULTS: Of 7024 participants, 1679 experienced 3,075 encounters. There were seven arrests, 30 charges, nine probation encounters, and 13 incarceration events /100 participants by age 35. Juvenile sanctions were most common for Black individuals. Among those experiencing juvenile sanctions, Black and White individuals had similar numbers of encounters, but Black individuals had more arrests and incarceration stays. For those without juvenile encounters, Black individuals had more encounters than White individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Research on health effects of criminal legal sanctions must consider encounters beyond incarceration and focus on life course trajectories and racial inequities.
Authors
LeMasters, K; Renson, A; Edwards, JK; Robinson, WR; Brinkley-Rubinstein, L; Delamater, P; Pence, B
MLA Citation
LeMasters, Katherine, et al. “Inequities in life course criminal legal system sanctions: measuring cumulative involvement.Ann Epidemiol, vol. 76, Dec. 2022, pp. 83–90. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.10.007.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1554190
PMID
36273701
Source
pubmed
Published In
Ann Epidemiol
Volume
76
Published Date
Start Page
83
End Page
90
DOI
10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.10.007

Research Areas:

Breast--Cancer--Epidemiology
COVID-19 (Disease)
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Demography
Epidemiology
Epidemiology--Research--Methodology
Epidemiology--Statistical methods
Gender
Gender Dysphoria
Gender Identity
Generative organs, Female--Cancer--Epidemiology
Generative organs, Female--Surgery
Gynecology
Gynecology--Social aspects
Health Equity
Health Services for Transgender Persons
Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy, Vaginal
Information storage and retrieval systems--Clinical epidemiology
Life Course
Medical epidemiology
Pharmacoepidemiology
Population aging
Salpingo-oophorectomy
Transgender Persons