Christina Williams

Positions:

Adjunct Associate Professor in the Department of Medicine

Medicine, Medical Oncology
School of Medicine

Member of the Duke Cancer Institute

Duke Cancer Institute
School of Medicine

Education:

Ph.D. 2009

University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill

Grants:

EGFR Testing Patterns and Outcomes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the VA Health System

Administered By
Duke Clinical Research Institute
Awarded By
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP
Role
Co Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Stage III NSCLC in the VA Health System

Administered By
Duke Clinical Research Institute
Awarded By
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP
Role
Co Investigator
Start Date
End Date

IPA - Teresa C Day

Administered By
Medicine, Medical Oncology
Awarded By
Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Publications:

Longitudinal assessment of colonoscopy adverse events in the prospective Cooperative Studies Program no. 380 colorectal cancer screening and surveillance cohort.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Data are limited regarding colonoscopy risk during long-term, programmatic colorectal cancer screening and follow-up. We aimed to describe adverse events during follow-up in a colonoscopy screening program after the baseline examination and examine factors associated with increased risk. METHODS: Cooperative Studies Program no. 380 includes 3121 asymptomatic veterans aged 50 to 75 years who underwent screening colonoscopy between 1994 and 1997. Periprocedure adverse events requiring significant intervention were defined as major events (other events were minor) and were tracked during follow-up for at least 10 years. Multivariable odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for factors associated with risk of follow-up adverse events. RESULTS: Of 3727 follow-up examinations in 1983 participants, adverse events occurred in 105 examinations (2.8%) in 93 individuals, including 22 major and 87 minor events (examinations may have had >1 event). Incidence of major events (per 1000 examinations) remained relatively stable over time, with 6.1 events at examination 2, 4.8 at examination 3, and 7.2 at examination 4. Examinations with major events included 1 perforation, 3 GI bleeds requiring intervention, and 17 cardiopulmonary events. History of prior colonoscopic adverse events was associated with increased risk of events (major or minor) during follow-up (OR, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-4.6). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term programmatic screening and surveillance was safe, as major events were rare during follow-up. However, serious cardiopulmonary events were the most common major events. These results highlight the need for detailed assessments of comorbid conditions during routine clinical practice, which could help inform individual decisions regarding the utility of ongoing colonoscopy follow-up.
Authors
Kobe, EA; Sullivan, BA; Qin, X; Redding, TS; Hauser, ER; Madison, AN; Miller, C; Efird, JT; Gellad, ZF; Weiss, D; Sims, KJ; Williams, CD; Lieberman, DA; Provenzale, D
MLA Citation
Kobe, Elizabeth A., et al. “Longitudinal assessment of colonoscopy adverse events in the prospective Cooperative Studies Program no. 380 colorectal cancer screening and surveillance cohort.Gastrointest Endosc, vol. 96, no. 3, Sept. 2022, pp. 553-562.e3. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.gie.2022.04.1343.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1520564
PMID
35533738
Source
pubmed
Published In
Gastrointest Endosc
Volume
96
Published Date
Start Page
553
End Page
562.e3
DOI
10.1016/j.gie.2022.04.1343

Health-Related Quality of Life by Gulf War Illness Case Status.

This study examines how health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and related indices vary by Gulf War illness (GWI) case status. The study population included veterans from the Gulf War Era Cohort and Biorepository (n = 1116). Outcomes were physical and mental health from the Veterans RAND 12 and depression, post-traumatic stress (PTSD), sleep disturbance, and pain. Kansas (KS) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) GWI definitions were used. Kansas GWI derived subtypes included GWI (met symptom criteria; no exclusionary conditions (KS GWI: Sym+/Dx-)) and those without GWI: KS noncase (1): Sym+/Dx+, KS noncase (2): Sym-/Dx+, and noncase (3): Sym-/Dx-. CDC-derived subtypes included CDC GWI severe, CDC GWI mild-to-moderate and CDC noncases. Case status and outcomes were examined using multivariable regression adjusted for sociodemographic and military-related characteristics. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine associations between GWI case status and binary measures for depression, PTSD, and severe pain. The KS GWI: Sym+/Dx- and KS noncase (1): Sym+/Dx+ groups had worse mental and physical HRQOL outcomes than veterans in the KS noncase (2): Sym-/Dx+ and KS noncase (3): Sym-/Dx- groups (ps < 0.001). Individuals who met the CDC GWI severe criteria had worse mental and physical HRQOL outcomes than those meeting the CDC GWI mild-to-moderate or CDC noncases (ps < 0.001). For other outcomes, results followed a similar pattern. Relative to the less symptomatic comparison subtypes, veterans who met the Kansas symptom criteria, regardless of exclusionary conditions, and those who met the CDC GWI severe criteria experienced lower HRQOL and higher rates of depression, PTSD, and severe pain.
Authors
Gifford, EJ; Boyle, SH; Vahey, J; Sims, KJ; Efird, JT; Chesnut, B; Stafford, C; Upchurch, J; Williams, CD; Helmer, DA; Hauser, ER
MLA Citation
Gifford, Elizabeth J., et al. “Health-Related Quality of Life by Gulf War Illness Case Status.Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 19, no. 8, Apr. 2022. Pubmed, doi:10.3390/ijerph19084425.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1515287
PMID
35457293
Source
pubmed
Published In
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume
19
Published Date
DOI
10.3390/ijerph19084425

Screening Colonoscopy Findings Are Associated With Noncolorectal Cancer Mortality.

INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists regarding the impact of various risk factors on noncolorectal cancer (CRC) mortality in healthy screening populations. We examined the impact of known CRC risk factors, including baseline colonoscopy findings, on non-CRC mortality in a screening population. METHODS: Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) #380 is comprised of 3,121 veterans aged 50-75 years who underwent screening colonoscopy from 1994 to 97 and were then followed for at least 10 years or until death. Hazard ratios (HRs) for risk factors on non-CRC mortality were estimated by multivariate Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: Current smoking (HR 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.78-2.52, compared with nonsmokers) and physical activity (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84-0.93) were the modifiable factors most associated with non-CRC mortality in CSP#380. In addition, compared with no neoplasia at baseline colonoscopy, non-CRC mortality was higher in participants with ≥3 small adenomas (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.06-1.94), advanced adenomas (HR 1.32, 95% CI 0.99-1.75), and CRC (HR 2.95, 95% CI 0.98-8.85). Those with 1-2 small adenomas were not at increased risk for non-CRC mortality (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.94-1.4). DISCUSSION: In a CRC screening population, known modifiable risk factors were significantly associated with 10-year non-CRC mortality. Furthermore, those who died from non-CRC causes within 10 years were more likely to have had high-risk findings at baseline colonoscopy. These results suggest that advanced colonoscopy findings may be a risk marker of poor health outcomes. Integrated efforts are needed to motivate healthy lifestyle changes during CRC screening, particularly in those with high-risk colonoscopy findings and unaddressed risk factors.
Authors
Sullivan, BA; Qin, X; Miller, C; Hauser, ER; Redding, TS; Gellad, ZF; Madison, AN; Musselwhite, LW; Efird, JT; Sims, KJ; Williams, CD; Weiss, D; Lieberman, D; Provenzale, D
MLA Citation
Sullivan, Brian A., et al. “Screening Colonoscopy Findings Are Associated With Noncolorectal Cancer Mortality.Clin Transl Gastroenterol, vol. 13, no. 4, Apr. 2022, p. e00479. Pubmed, doi:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000479.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1513748
PMID
35333777
Source
pubmed
Published In
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Volume
13
Published Date
Start Page
e00479
DOI
10.14309/ctg.0000000000000479

The Interaction of Vitamin D and Corticosteroids: A Mortality Analysis of 26,508 Veterans Who Tested Positive for SARS-CoV-2.

This data-based cohort consisted of 26,508 (7%) United States veterans out of the 399,290 who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 from 1 March to 10 September 2020. We aimed to assess the interaction of post-index vitamin D (Vit D) and corticosteroid (CRT) use on 30-day mortality among hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Combination Vit D and CRT drug use was assessed according to four multinomial pairs (-|+, -|-, +|+, +|-). Respective categorical effects were computed on a log-binomial scale as adjusted relative risk (aRR). Approximately 6% of veterans who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 died within 30 days of their index date. Among hospitalized patients, a significantly decreased aRR was observed for the use of Vit D in the absence of CRTs relative to patients who received CRTs but not Vit D (aRR = 0.30; multiplicity corrected, p = 0.0004). Among patients receiving systemically administered CRTs (e.g., dexamethasone), the use of Vit D was associated with fewer deaths in hospitalized patients (aRR = 0.51) compared with non-hospitalized patients (aRR = 2.5) (P-for-Interaction = 0.0071). Evaluating the effect of modification of these compounds in the context of hospitalization may aid in the management of COVID-19 and provide a better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this and future infectious disease outbreaks.
Authors
Efird, JT; Anderson, EJ; Jindal, C; Redding, TS; Thompson, AD; Press, AM; Upchurch, J; Williams, CD; Choi, YM; Suzuki, A
MLA Citation
Efird, Jimmy T., et al. “The Interaction of Vitamin D and Corticosteroids: A Mortality Analysis of 26,508 Veterans Who Tested Positive for SARS-CoV-2.Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 19, no. 1, Dec. 2021. Pubmed, doi:10.3390/ijerph19010447.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1506013
PMID
35010701
Source
pubmed
Published In
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume
19
Published Date
DOI
10.3390/ijerph19010447

Gene-Toxicant Interactions in Gulf War Illness: Differential Effects of the PON1 Genotype.

About 25-35% of United States veterans who fought in the 1990-1991 Gulf War report several moderate or severe chronic systemic symptoms, defined as Gulf War illness (GWI). Thirty years later, there is little consensus on the causes or biological underpinnings of GWI. The Gulf War Era Cohort and Biorepository (GWECB) was designed to investigate genetic and environmental associations with GWI and consists of 1343 veterans. We investigate candidate gene-toxicant interactions that may be associated with GWI based on prior associations found in human and animal model studies, focusing on SNPs in or near ACHE, BCHE, and PON1 genes to replicate results from prior studies. SOD1 was also considered as a candidate gene. CDC Severe GWI, the primary outcome, was observed in 26% of the 810 deployed veterans included in this study. The interaction between the candidate SNP rs662 and pyridostigmine bromide (PB) pills was found to be associated with CDC Severe GWI. Interactions between PB pill exposure and rs3917545, rs3917550, and rs2299255, all in high linkage disequilibrium in PON1, were also associated with respiratory symptoms. These SNPs could point toward biological pathways through which GWI may develop, which could lead to biomarkers to detect GWI or to better treatment options for veterans with GWI.
Authors
Vahey, J; Gifford, EJ; Sims, KJ; Chesnut, B; Boyle, SH; Stafford, C; Upchurch, J; Stone, A; Pyarajan, S; Efird, JT; Williams, CD; Hauser, ER
MLA Citation
Vahey, Jacqueline, et al. “Gene-Toxicant Interactions in Gulf War Illness: Differential Effects of the PON1 Genotype.Brain Sci, vol. 11, no. 12, Nov. 2021. Pubmed, doi:10.3390/brainsci11121558.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1502314
PMID
34942860
Source
pubmed
Published In
Brain Sciences
Volume
11
Published Date
DOI
10.3390/brainsci11121558