Fang-Fang Yin

Overview:

Stereotactic radiosurgery, Stereotactic body radiation therapy, treatment planning optimization, knowledge guided radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, image-guided radiation therapy, oncological imaging and informatics

Positions:

Gustavo S. Montana Distinguished Professor of Radiation Oncology

Radiation Oncology
School of Medicine

Professor in Radiation Oncology

Radiation Oncology
School of Medicine

Director of the Medical Physics Graduate Program at Duke Kunshan University

DKU Faculty
Duke Kunshan University

Professor of Medical Physics at Duke Kunshan University

DKU Faculty
Duke Kunshan University

Member of the Duke Cancer Institute

Duke Cancer Institute
School of Medicine

Education:

B.S. 1982

Zhejiang University (China)

M.S. 1987

Bowling Green State University

Ph.D. 1992

The University of Chicago

Certificate In Therapeutic Radiologic Physics, Radiation Physics

American Board of Radiology

Grants:

Motion Management Using 4D-MRI for Liver Cancer in Radiation Therapy

Administered By
Radiation Oncology
Awarded By
National Institutes of Health
Role
Co-Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Digital tomosynthesis: a new paradigm for radiation treatment verification

Administered By
Radiation Oncology
Awarded By
National Institutes of Health
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Robotic SPECT for Biological Imaging Onboard Radiation Therapy Machines

Administered By
Radiation Oncology
Awarded By
National Institutes of Health
Role
Co-Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Accurate, High Resolution 3D Dosimetry

Administered By
Radiation Oncology
Awarded By
National Institutes of Health
Role
Collaborator
Start Date
End Date

A Limited-angle Intra-fractional Verification (LIVE) System for SBRT Treatments

Administered By
Radiation Oncology
Awarded By
National Institutes of Health
Role
Co-Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Publications:

Evaluation of dosimetric uncertainty caused by MR geometric distortion in MRI-based liver SBRT treatment planning.

PURPOSE: MRI-based treatment planning is a promising technique for liver stereotactic-body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning to improve target volume delineation and reduce radiation dose to normal tissues. MR geometric distortion, however, is a source of potential error in MRI-based treatment planning. The aim of this study is to investigate dosimetric uncertainties caused by MRI geometric distortion in MRI-based treatment planning for liver SBRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted using computer simulations. 3D MR geometric distortion was simulated using measured data in the literature. Planning MR images with distortions were generated by integrating the simulated 3D MR geometric distortion onto planning CT images. MRI-based treatment plans were then generated on the planning MR images with two dose calculation methods: (1) using original CT numbers; and (2) using organ-specific assigned CT numbers. Dosimetric uncertainties of various dose-volume-histogram parameters were determined as their differences between the simulated MRI-based plans and the original clinical CT-based plans for five liver SBRT cases. RESULTS: The average simulated distortion for the five liver SBRT cases was 2.77 mm. In the case of using original CT numbers for dose calculation, the average dose uncertainties for target volumes and critical structures were <0.5 Gy, and the average target volume percentage at prescription dose uncertainties was 0.97%. In the case of using assigned CT numbers, the average dose uncertainties for target volumes and critical structures were <1.0 Gy, and the average target volume percentage at prescription dose uncertainties was 2.02%. CONCLUSIONS: Dosimetric uncertainties caused by MR geometric distortion in MRI-based liver SBRT treatment planning was generally small (<1 Gy) when the distortion is 3 mm.
Authors
Han, S; Yin, F-F; Cai, J
MLA Citation
Han, Silu, et al. “Evaluation of dosimetric uncertainty caused by MR geometric distortion in MRI-based liver SBRT treatment planning.J Appl Clin Med Phys, vol. 20, no. 2, Feb. 2019, pp. 43–50. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/acm2.12520.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1368270
PMID
30697915
Source
pubmed
Published In
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Volume
20
Published Date
Start Page
43
End Page
50
DOI
10.1002/acm2.12520

Effect of machine learning methods on predicting NSCLC overall survival time based on Radiomics analysis.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of machine learning methods on predicting the Overall Survival (OS) for non-small cell lung cancer based on radiomics features analysis. METHODS: A total of 339 radiomic features were extracted from the segmented tumor volumes of pretreatment computed tomography (CT) images. These radiomic features quantify the tumor phenotypic characteristics on the medical images using tumor shape and size, the intensity statistics and the textures. The performance of 5 feature selection methods and 8 machine learning methods were investigated for OS prediction. The predicted performance was evaluated with concordance index between predicted and true OS for the non-small cell lung cancer patients. The survival curves were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier algorithm and compared by the log-rank tests. RESULTS: The gradient boosting linear models based on Cox's partial likelihood method using the concordance index feature selection method obtained the best performance (Concordance Index: 0.68, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.62~ 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results demonstrated that certain machine learning and radiomics analysis method could predict OS of non-small cell lung cancer accuracy.
Authors
MLA Citation
Sun, Wenzheng, et al. “Effect of machine learning methods on predicting NSCLC overall survival time based on Radiomics analysis.Radiat Oncol, vol. 13, no. 1, Oct. 2018, p. 197. Pubmed, doi:10.1186/s13014-018-1140-9.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1353658
PMID
30290849
Source
pubmed
Published In
Radiation Oncology
Volume
13
Published Date
Start Page
197
DOI
10.1186/s13014-018-1140-9

On-Board Digital Tomosynthesis: An Emerging New Technology for Image-Guided Radiation Therapy

Authors
Wu, QJ; Godfrey, D; Ren, L; Yoo, S; Yin, F-F
MLA Citation
Wu, Q. Jackie, et al. “On-Board Digital Tomosynthesis: An Emerging New Technology for Image-Guided Radiation Therapy.” IMAGE-GUIDED RADIATION THERAPY, 2012, pp. 187–201.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1547247
Source
wos-lite
Published Date
Start Page
187
End Page
201

Input feature design and its impact on the performance of deep learning models for predicting fluence maps in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Objective. Deep learning (DL) models for fluence map prediction (FMP) have great potential to reduce treatment planning time in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) by avoiding the lengthy inverse optimization process. This study aims to improve the rigor of input feature design in a DL-FMP model by examining how different designs of input features influence model prediction performance.Approach. This study included 231 head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy patients. Three input feature designs were investigated. The first design (D1) assumed that information of all critical structures from all beam angles should be combined to predict fluence maps. The second design (D2) assumed that local anatomical information was sufficient for predicting radiation intensity of a beamlet at a respective beam angle. The third design (D3) assumed the need for both local anatomical information and inter-beam modulation to predict radiation intensity values of the beamlets that intersect at a voxel. For each input design, we tailored the DL model accordingly. All models were trained using the same set of ground truth plans (GT plans). The plans generated by DL models (DL plans) were analyzed using key dose-volume metrics. One-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons correction (Bonferroni method) was performed (significance level = 0.05).Main results. For PTV-related metrics, all DL plans had significantly higher maximum dose (p < 0.001), conformity index (p < 0.001), and heterogeneity index (p < 0.001) compared to GT plans, with D2 being the worst performer. Meanwhile, except for cord+5 mm (p < 0.001), DL plans of all designs resulted in OAR dose metrics that are comparable to those of GT plans.Significance. Local anatomical information contains most of the information that DL models need to predict fluence maps for clinically acceptable OAR sparing. Input features from beam angles are needed to achieve the best PTV coverage. These results provide valuable insights for further improvement of DL-FMP models and DL models in general.
Authors
Li, X; Ge, Y; Wu, Q; Wang, C; Sheng, Y; Wang, W; Stephens, H; Yin, F-F; Wu, QJ
MLA Citation
Li, Xinyi, et al. “Input feature design and its impact on the performance of deep learning models for predicting fluence maps in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.Phys Med Biol, vol. 67, no. 21, Oct. 2022. Pubmed, doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ac9882.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1553015
PMID
36206747
Source
pubmed
Published In
Phys Med Biol
Volume
67
Published Date
DOI
10.1088/1361-6560/ac9882

Image-guided radiation therapy and frameless stereotactic radiation therapy

This chapter gives an overview of how to adapt diagnostic imaging technologies on to linear accelerators for image-guided frameless stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) when the primary focus is on target localization and verification inside the treatment room. Basic applications of in-room imaging techniques are discussed along with a description of several commercially available image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) solutions. The remainder of the chapter is devoted to current trends in frameless SRT treatment techniques with an emphasis on the role of image-guidance.
Authors
McMahon, R; Yin, FF
MLA Citation
McMahon, R., and F. F. Yin. “Image-guided radiation therapy and frameless stereotactic radiation therapy.” Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy, 2014, pp. 211–29. Scopus, doi:10.1201/b16776-17.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1549072
Source
scopus
Published Date
Start Page
211
End Page
229
DOI
10.1201/b16776-17

Research Areas:

Bioinformatics
Medical physics